Going NOWHERE Fast

Going NOWHERE Fast...:)


Well, well....:) Now you can stretch your brain a little more and understand what Science is grasping at straws to explain... The Supersolidity Effect..

Not unlike in the case of liquid helium 4 superfluidity, the thought constraints due to the Equivalence Principle between Gravitational and Inertial Masses created the conjecture of solid superfluidity..

This is a much simpler problem if one understands quantum mechanics, motion (accordingly to my model) and simple topology.

Supersolidity is the idea that a solid can freely pass through itself ??? whatever that means.
The experiment that gave rise to such a contrived idea is the following:
a) Pick up a bucket of solid helium 4
b) Rotate it around its axis and cool it down further.
c) At a given temperature, the bucket of Helium 4 suddenly starts rotating faster....:)

The simple-minded explanation is that somehow the core of the solid helium rotating volume simply stopped rotating while the exterior crust started rotating faster to conserve angular momentum.

This is an idea with very large holes..>:)
a) First, for the middle core to stop rotating, it has to receive a torque..>:) supposelly the same torque that makes the exterior crust to rotate faster afterwards... THE OBVIOUS QUESTION IS WHY??????

WHY WOULD SUCH TORQUE BE CREATED?

I am not going to waste time thinking along those lines...

Quantum Mechanics provides a much simpler although extremely surprising (for the people who doesn't know the Hypergeoemtrical Universe theory) answer.

As the temperature goes down, the wavefunction defining each atom in the spinning bucket gets wider. This means that any observable quantity has to be the result of averaging this wavefunction with the observable operator. In the case of velocity, the operator is the inclination of the local space. I will not try to draw a Mexican Hat or a twisted Mexican Hat...:) it is too difficult...

I can tell you in simple words... As the wavefunction gets wider, it starts probing positions on the other side of the center of rotation, that is, it probes motion with components both positve and negative. This averages the state of motion to a lower effective velocity. As the temperature goes down further the masses positioned close to the center of rotation changes their state of motion into no motion and that state doesn't change with an increase in angular velocity.

This means at that lower temperature, the boson solid loses moment of inertia but doesn't lose gravitational mass. It also doesn't lose inertial mass for linear motion!!!!!

This decouples Gravitational Mass from Inertial Mass and Linear Inertial Mass from Rotational Inertial Mass...:) QED.

If you now ask me what would happen in a bosonic celestial body that is close to zero kelvin... I would say it would rotate at the speed of light...:) No ifs or buts...

If you read my theory you will realize that there are other ways to reach things deemed impossible by our Science....:)

Rebel against that... There is a lot to lose if one stops dreaming, but to dream that things are in a way they are not is not conducive to a great human adventure...

Cheers,

MP

The Silver Surfer and The Hypergeometrical Universe

The Silver Surfer and The Hypergeometrical Universe

I am back after a long hiatus due to life...:)

In the next few blogs I will try to clarify some aspects of motion. It would be a good time to reread my prior blog about Why do things move?.

The trouble started when Einstein proposed the Principle of Equivalence between Inertial and Gravitational Masses. Every time someone of great stature proposes something, that becomes either a beacon of light in the darkness of our ignorance or a tremendous hindrance to real progress..>:)

In this specific case, I believe it became a tremendous hindrance to thought.

I mentioned in the past that inertial and gravitational masses are not the same....or better one can have one without having the other... or have both for some kind of motion and not for another...:)

In any event, they are not the same and I will demonstrate that in the next blog as well as hinting how to move at the speed of light sidewise...:) that is, within our 3D Universe... :)

But first, let's address the Silver Surfer, the alien looking alien that surfs the Universe in a surfboard...:)

It is a handy concept the idea that if the Universe is a 3D Hyperspherical Spatial Disturbance (Wave) traveling at the speed of light radially, we would all be surfing that wave...:)

As you know the Radial direction is preferential but non-observable, since we can only measure relative motion with the 3D Hypersurface. On the left you will find the Silver Surfer just sitting on its board while the Hyperspherical Shock Wave Universe drags him along...:)

As I mentioned in the blog Why do things move, motion is a relaxation of local deformation of 4D space. A local deformation is created through the interaction between matter. Once the interaction vanishes, one is left with a state of deformation or motion which will relax until it reaches the region where is velocity matches its Hubble velocity. At that point, the surfer will be on the situation shown on the left...:)

Similarly one can envision the surfer riding a local dilaton field (local force). Under those conditions, the local space will be slightly deformed.

In the left picture we can see it traveling to the left...:)

Similarly, one can travel to the right...:)

These pictures should provide a clear picture...:) of what motions means within the framework of my theory: Motion is the relaxation of local 4D space deformation. 4D Space deformation is created by interaction between matter (dilators).

Now you have the basic understanding that will allow you to understand the difference between gravitational mass and inertial mass. That will be covered next..>:)

Cheers,

MP

Some Hints on the Onionlike Flying Orchestra

Some Hints on the Onionlike Flying Orchestra

This Blog was written prior to my vacation and job change...:) I found it today when I started to prepare myself to write about the Hyperons...:)

I actually did not have time to work on the Hyperon Family during the vacation but I hope to do so tomorrow - a rainy Saturday...:)

The Onionlike description is accurate... I had to provide the model in stages.... It is more didactic.. Onionlike because there are different views of the same process which contains different level of detail... Not unlike thinking about Earth as a little Ball rotating around the Sun... On a closer look you can see that Earth rotates around its own axis... On a even closer look you start to see that there is a Moon and Earth and Moon circle around their center of mass....:)

In the Hypergeometrical Standard Model... Electron and Proton are quite simple and fundamental... a 4 notes dimensional chord... Electron and Proton differs from each other on which note is played first...:)

When one comes into a Neutron, I initially told you that it was a dimer... Later I disclosed the 8 notes chord associated with that particle... Later, I will tell you that the eight notes chord can also be described by two eight notes chords (the original dimer paradigm, just now told with dimensional chords)...:) In the case of some hyperons (composed of three 4 notes chords), the degeneracy is three-fold...:) or you start to have three twelve notes chords being played at the same time... I will later make some pictures for you to understand this better...:)

In any event, you should be able to get the gist... Under a degenerate dimensional chord particles, one could have an orbital angular momentum (an extra quantum number)...

Here is the Lost Blog... Enjoy

-----------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
Life changes and remains the same...:) I am off to another vacation and will work on the Hyperon Family.

I can advance a litte hint on a sutle aspect of the Flying Orchestra. As you might remember, the Universe is modeled as a lightspeed expanding hyperspherical 3D Universe embedded in a 4D Cartesian Continuous Spatial Framework. This expansion, shown in the above picture, is timed by an Cosmological Clock (Cosmological Time). Not unlike the expansion direction R, the Cosmological time cannot be observed (can be observed only if you look very far away in any direction - that boundary will be expanding at the speed of light and timed by this Cosmological Time).

The only time that is observed in the XYZ-Tau spacetime framework is the proper time or the projection of the Cosmological Time onto one's referencial frame.

Now let's talk about what really matters. Early in this series, I presented a representation of a Neutron as a Electron-Proton Dilator dimer. Later, I refined the model and introduced the Spinning Double Potential Well and the DIMENSIONAL CHORDS associated with Proton, Electron and Neutron.
-----------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is how far I got before getting to the vacation...:)

I will try to clarify further tomorrow...:)

Cheers,

MP

The Universe Has To Wait

The Universe Has To Wait

First of all, thanks for making my Philica paper the most read paper in the whole Journal. I really appreciate your interest and your support in spreading information about my theory.

I have been very busy and haven't been able to write the last blog with the Hyperon Family Model. Sorry for that.

In the meantime, I reassembled the basis for the Hypergeometrical Universe, that is, the revision of Newton's Laws (all four) and the Quantization of Time.

Pseudo time-quantization is the seed for the Hypergeometrical Standard Model and the amazing concept of the Fundamental Dilator.

These four blogs are lined up in reverse chronological order..:) for your enjoyment.

Please review them and let me know your thoughts...

Hopefully next weekend I will have some time.

Cheers,

MP

Newton's Third Law

Newton's Third Law

By now, I am sure you people are upset that I have been picking on poor Newton. It just happens that his work is fundamental and revising it is a sign of respect and something I couldn't avoid.

The last law states that the force sensed by two interacting bodies are equal and in opposing directions (signs).

This is the easiest one to recast.

I will be terse and brief since the reproduction of the forces is enough to show that they have the same value and opposite signs. I will only give you the physical (geometrical) interpretation of the Quantum Lagrangian Principle.

The picture above displays the Universe on the RX cross section (right panel in the Hypergeometrical Universe Icon). The age of the Universe is around 15 billion light years and lambda is the Compton wavelength of an atomic mass unit particle, so this is not draw to the correct scale..:)

I show two bodies about to step one de Broglie wavelength in the Universe lightspeed expansion.

It is impossible to draw things correctly and still be didactic. A large mass body, represented on the right, will have a very small Compton wavelength. In my calculations, I represent their wavelegnth as being zero for simplicity. Under those conditions the single dilator (one a.m.u. mass) interacts with a continuous field (it still oscillates but their maximae are too close together to affect the calculations). I just had to calculate the shift on the next maximae generated by the dilator along the radial direction. In the absence of interaction, the dilator's field would have a maximum exactly along the radial line. In the presence of the interacting body, that maximum shifts sidewise and one just has to calculate a dilaton gradient and equate it to zero (l'Hospital rule..:).

The effect of being a large (macroscopic) body is two-fold: it makes its effective Compton wavelenght to be zero and it scales the intensity by the number of dilators it contains. One kilogram of anything (mass or charge) would contain 1000 Avogrado's number of dilators. Thus the local dilaton field, in the proximity of the large body, would be much larger and the shift would be inversely proportional to that number of dilators.

Since the shift is proportional to the acceleration, one can see that the acceleration in the larger body would be inversely proportional to its "mass".

That should be enough for this law. I am eager to go back to the Hyperons. Please, feel free to ask any questions.

Cheers,

MP