New Particle Baffles Scientists...:)

New Particle Baffles Scientists...:)

A new particle Y(4140)is baffling Science, more specifically Quantum Chromodynamics and the Standard Model. It should be no surprise that that particle is perfectly explained within the framework of the Hypergeometrical Universe.

This is the Wikipedia entry where I get most of my information...:)

Because it decays into J/ψ and φ mesons, it has been suggested that this particle is composed of a charm quark and charm antiquark.

The missing rest mass from the decay is only about 27.0 ± 2.9 ± 1.2 MeV/c2.

I already provided the the Hypergeometrical Standard Model representation for the decaying products of this particle and it shouldn't be difficult for a reader to figure out what is the structure of particle Y(4140).

I will give the answer this weekend when I have more time to dedicate to the Hypergeometrical Universe.

Cheers,

MP

How to subscribe to the Hypergeometrical Universe

How to subscribe to the Hypergeometrical Universe

This was a puzzling question. I think I figured out how to burn my feed in the FeedBurner, but then they told me to relocate those feeds into Google again.

Please try it and let me know if it works. There is a link to Subscribe to right on the right panel of the blog...:)

Cheers,

MP

PS- I've been awfully busy and haven't been able to blog the theory. Despite of that, whenever someone asks a question, I always manage to make time and provide a brief answer. Please, feel free to ask questions.

The Silence of the Lambs

The Silence of The Lambs..:)

This blog is about to reach its 30,000 unique IP readers...:) Hurray!!!!

I didn't know there were so many cosmologists, string theorists, particle physicists in the planet...:)

There are many reasons to celebrate...

The theory has been published in two books:

• Quantization in Astrophysics - containing the Grand Unification and New Cosmology Paradigm
• Hadron Physics New Energy Issues - Containing the Hypergeometrical Standard Model

not that bad for something created in the everyday commuting to work (on a shaking NYC subway..>:)

and reached the following crowning achievements...:)

1. I demonstrated that the theory provides the appropriate solutions to the Precession of Mercury's Perihelion and the Gravitational Lensing problems.
2. In the Gravitional Lensing blog, I showed how a simple reasoning about the usage of Gerber's potential could be used to show that Gerber's potential (Hypergeometrical Potential) could predict the correct Gravitational light deflection.  Somehow that simple reasoning was beyond the specialists of the time and since then. Einstein, very cunningly, placed the responsibility for the demise of Gerber's ideas in the hands of the specialists at the time.  Something like, I wash my hands..:)
3. I provided the solution to the Pioneer Anomaly in which I clarify the meaning of Hubble equation and the topology of looking into the past...:)
4. I provided a full description of all particles (hyperon family and isotopes).
5. I corrected Newton's equations by eliminating all non-geometrical elements of Classical Mechanics.
6. I kept the theory relativistic despite of introducing Absolute Time and a Preferential Frame of Reference or at least a preferential direction of reference (R).
7. Somehow, it seems that I introduced a geometrical interpretation of Lorentz transforms of all things... I did not hear any angry relativistic cosmologists telling me otherwise...which is a surprise... I thought everyone knew that Lorentz transform is a rotation by an imaginary angle...
8. I introduced a new model for matter... the first non-obvious model. Up to know things were waves, particles or particle-waves...:) The dilator is a wavegenerator that flows like a wave...:)
9. The Humble Fundamental Dilator shows how a proton and an electron are the same entity and have the same 4D Mass, thus simplifying tremendously the understanding and unification of the Universe.
10. The Humble Fundamental Dilator is also the hidden variable Einstein tried throoughout his whole life to find. The entity that creates Quantum Mechanics.
11. I challenged the concept of Field and showed that implicit in it is the existence of a Cosmological Coherence (all dilators in the Universe dilate in synch with their local dilaton fields). Synchronization is evident using absolute time (in the RXYZ frame).
    
    
12. I Grand Unified all the Forces (Gravitation and Electromagnetism) while providing a replacement for the Gluon-Quark paradigm (the dilator itself) and for the Electroweak force (the advent of nonlinear hadronics)...
13. In replacing the Gluon-Quark paradigm I modified the symmetry requirements for a Grand Unification or Supersymmetry Theory. The pesky Reciprocal Symmetry is eliminated and with that the need that everything very slow to have the same energy as everything very fast...:) This is an outrageous symmetry... Physicist should be kissing my ring for eliminating such nasty constraint....:)
14. I proposed the solution for all energy problems in the shape of fusion reactors while produce fusion (or fission) products along a single direction (or cone)...:) Energy is readily extracted through magneto-hydrodynamics means... Charged products make up powerful currents to be slowed down by reversed accelerators...:)
15. I proposed a new topology for the Cosmos...:) which eliminates the need for Einstein Cosmological Constant, dark energy, inflation... This at a time when inflationary people are adjusting their parameters to explain the whole chimichanga...:) Very unfortunate...:) At least at this time, I would love to say Ockham's Razor... People have already readied their acceptance speeches for the Nobel Ceremony...:) Horrible situation...:)
16. In creating this new topology, I explained why the speed of light is the limiting speed in our Fabric of Space..(3D Universe)...
17. I acknowledged that in fact things can move faster than the speed of light by traveling (surfing) along an interference pattern...:) This might be someday used to create superluminal traveling when people learn how to pattern dilaton fields...:) or die waiting to ride a Tachyon driven spacecraft...:)
18. I provided the equations to Cosmological Constants (vacuum permittivity and magnetic susceptibility).
19. I also showed that the Gravitational Constant is not constant and scaled down with the inverse of the age of the Universe....:) Earlier times had stronger Gravitational fields..>:)
20. The Gravitational "constant" dependence provides the blueprint for the demise of the Universe...:) The relaxation of the dilators... A totally new Cosmogony..>:)
21. I provided an alternative explanation for the Action-At-Distance paradox which bothered Einstein so much and that is the basis for a total delusional state of mind where people throw their hands up and accept anything..:) from time travel to time traveling backwards in Black Holes ... to Black Holes...:)
22. I also provided an alternative explanation for the Double Slit Experiment. In my theory, dilators (electron included) travel on a four dimensional space at the center of a horospherical reference frame. The waves it creates are the same it surfs, that is, the electron surfs a four-dimensional wave (dilaton field) and by simple projection, it also surfs the 3D projection (de Broglie waves). This means that the de Broglie wave is not a matter wave. Instead, it is a metric deformation wave created by the dilator. The much larger wavelength is due to the way things are projected in an hyperbolic space... The electron in the two slit experiment will travel through a single slit while its dilaton field projection will travel through both...:) On the other side of the barrier, the electron will continue to surf the interferometric dilaton fields and thus will deposit itself on an interferometric pattern onto the detector..:) Very simple and again I would love to say, Ockham's Razor... despite my qualms about its usage...:)
23. I provided a simple multi-coherence (dilator dimensional chords) description for each and every hyperon and isotope (isotopes are trivial since they only have protons and neutrons)...: )
24. I provided an alternative solution to the mass paradigm by assigning it to an overlapping 4D volume (dilator overlapping with the fabric of space at specific phases of the dilator spinning).
25. I created an extrinsic representation for the Spin.... that obscure quantity that bothered so many quantum physics students for so long...:) and explained What the Hell is the meaning of 1/2 ... as you might know rotation description does not include any quadratic potential and thus there isn't any zero point rotation....:) It was always a bothering 1/2 to me...:)
26. In making Spin extrinsic, I introduced the delightful Girlfriend on a Swing Gedanken Experiment to show how time could be Pseudo-Quantized..>:)
    
27. I corrected all Newton's equations (Four of them) and provided the really relativistic Biot-Savart law. That law can be used to project better Tokamaks if that is the way one wants to proceed.
28. Einstein also got his share...:) In creating an Absolute Time and explaining the meaning of inertia, I rebutted Mach's principle of nonlocal interaction and restored Newton's Absolute Time..>:) which times the existence of the Universe as opposed to our short existence...:)
    
29. I did all this by looking into what people did right and throwing away without fear what people did wrong...:) That was easy since I don't have to write this as a grant to my reactionary peers..:)
30. Most of all, I told you that the most important outlet for Physics - The Cornell-Los Alamos E-Print Repository should be in the hands of someone more capable than Paul Ginsparg. It is a shame Science can be silenced by arbitrary actions of a single person...:)

I also pleaded for my Lambs not to remain silent and to speak up their minds. I value criticism and would be happy to post any one of your meaningful comments. I know that in those thirty thousand readers many are scientists (professional scientists).

What I expect from them is either a statement telling me that I made a mistake here or there or some active action against the barriers that precluded a more wider distribution of this theory, namely, to request, demand that my theory receives a 1 megabyte space on the Cornell-Los Alamos E-Print Repository hard drive..:) NOT TOO MUCH TO ASK...:)

I've fulfilled all the requirements to post the theory there... (already peer-reviewed, published work that has been endorsed)...:)

Double-click the Bird below to find out more..>:)

I would welcome anyone to take the initiative to publish my paper on the Cornell-Los Alamos Arxives. :)

The pdf is here. This is a shorter version of the theory. Just below 1 megabyte length. It was accepted and endorsed the last time I attempted posting it there.

As I mentioned, I would be eternally grateful to anyone (My Giordano Bruno) that would bring this work to a wider audience through posting it at the Arxives or through forwarding this blog link or the pdfs to other people...

Considering that this theory provides a new paradigm for Coherent Nuclear Fusion, the planet you might save might be yours...:)

Feynman wouldn't blink in face of this challenge...:)

The current version of the work is here.

I know that if you do so, Paul Ginsparg might place you on his blacklist. I know that I am not a professional scientist any longer..:) I know it all....

I also know the VALUE OF IDEAS and that they are worth fighting for. I don't expect any thing less from a scientist (professional or not)...

Just think, "What would Richard P. Feynman do????"

Poets say science takes away from the beauty of the stars - mere globs of gas atoms. I, too, can see the stars on a desert night, and feel them. But do I see less or more? Richard P. Feynman

Don't make me explain analogies:

• Poets - String Theorist, Supersymmetrists...Gauge Physicists...:)
• the Beauty of the Stars - The Beauty of Weyl Fermions, Higgs, Bosons, Dirac Matrices, etc...
• Mere globs of gas atoms - My humble and simple theory
• Feynman - The little me...

Cheers,

MP

PS- Since the first release of this blog, I had the opportunity to discuss my theory with Craig Markwardt from JPL.  I will present the discussion in its interity soon.

I wonder if my friends from the Laser Laboratory at UofR or at the Fermi Lab are reading the changes in paradigm for nuclear fusion....:) I once told Professor Huizenga while attending a party at his house, that I knew how to make a Gamma Ray laser... He looked very surprised and most likely somewhat amused..>:)

I am sure that in his mind briefly passed those concerns about the problems pumping an ultrafast decaying nuclear transition, etc... As usual, people can only think within the paradigms they lived by...I wasn't able to create any interest in that brief interaction...:)

I told the same thing to Gary Holton many years ago... Life is full of hits and misses...As usual , I would love to hear from my friends at UPenn, Princeton, Berkeley, UofChicago..>:) CERN, Steven Hawking comes to mind, the 5Dimension Centre, USAF, Whiteman Airforce Base, The Institute for Advanced Studies, well, the Devil Himself (I mean, Paul Ginsparg).....>:)

Energy Conservation and the Fundamental Dilator

Energy Conservation 

and 

the Fundamental Dilator

David Freiberg has left a new comment on your post "The Hypergeometrical Force":

Wait, wait, wait. How does a proton, with hundreds of times more mass than an electron, turn into an electron? Does the Law of Conservation of Matter and Energy still apply? If so, where does all the energy go when it does this go and where does the energy come from to add the mass? 

David was kind to ask how energy conservation resists such an outrageous transformation as proposed in the Fundamental Dilator paradigm.

The answer has to contain the circumstances where these transformations take place and the emphasis on the fact that the Fundamental Dilator replaces the construct particle.  The replacement of a particle by a coherence between deformation states of a 4D spatial metric (5D spacetime metric) is basic for the understanding of this paradigm.

Currently David thinks about particles (electron, proton..) as having mass, charge - fundamental properties assigned for the life of the particle...:)  Of course, the Fundamental Dilator makes these properties transients associated with states of a coherence.  The only way this would be consistent with observation would be if we were always observing a single face (state) of this coherence.

That is exactly the case. To achieve that one has to remember that the coherence (tunneling between deformation states) is accompanied by spinning within the 4D spatial manifold where the lightspeed expanding hyperspherical shockwave Universe (our 3D Universe) exists.

The Ball Diagram shown above displays the not only the transformation (tunneling between deformation states) but also the orientation change (with respect to our 3D Universe) as the dilator goes about his life.

The initial state is the one that is in phase with the 3D Shockwave Universe. Due to the very, very small dimension along one of the directions (R), as the spinning takes place, the overlap between our dilator displacement volume and the 3D Universe vanishes.  Only at "quantized" phases of spinning is that there is overlap. ONLY at "quantized" phases there is interaction.

This stroboscopic nature and the 4D topology are the source of Quantum Mechanics.

This diagram shows two electrons belonging to a Cooper Pair.  As you can see, despite of the non-static nature of the dilator, their interaction when the dilator is flush with the 3D shockwave universe, is always consistent with what David considers their nature to be, that is, an electron always repels another electron.

The sideways phases have little overlap with our 3D Universe due to the initial symmetry of the problem and the symmetry of the involved states.

Notice that due to the coherent form in which these changes take place, the dilaton field is generated coherently, that is, the dilaton phases are always in phase with the propagating metric disturbances (dilatons) since they travel at the same speed (the speed of light).  As an aside, only in the case of Cooper pairs, the the intermediate phases anihilate each other's contributions, reducing their interaction to an Anti-Gravitational strength!!!

The Energy conservation is related to the size (3D volume overlap) of this footprint.  Local deformations of the Fabric of Space (local tilts) would impact into the dilator Kinetic Energy or Potential Kinetic Energy (Strong Force). Depending upon what is the choice for the laws of motion (Newton's Laws or my Quantum Lagrangian Principle) mass will behave in a hyperbolic manner (e.g. Lorentz Transform or Strict Relativity - hyperbolic cosines projections) or in a linear manner (through cosine projections).

There is a principle of 4D displacement volume conservation which is applied to the whole Universe, yielding ZERO, that is, the total displacement volume of all dilators in the Universe is ZERO.

The 3D projection of this law is our energy-momentum conservation law.

Please feel free to ask questions.

Cheers,

MP

The Hypergeometrical Force

The Hypergeometrical Force

When I DERIVED the equation for the Hypergeometrical Force – the Grand Unification Force - used a setup with two infinitesimal elements of current (or mass flow).

These infinitesimal elements of current or flow defined a direction within the four dimensional spatial manifold. This direction is shown as velocities in the formulas.  Despite of having velocities, these formulas were derived for constant velocities, where the velocities were referred from a relaxed Fabric of Space reference system.  To eliminate this constraint one has to derived the potential through adiabatic integration followed by the derivation of a generalized force according to Lagrangian formalism!!!

These means that the force equations below are constant velocity forces. Despite of this constraint, they are quite usefull for making simplied reasonings about dynamics.

Here are the equations for Electromagnetism and Gravitation:

(1)

Where C1 and C2 are the charges traveling at V1 and V2 and c is the speed of light. R12 is a vector from charge 1 to charge 2.

Similarly for Gravitation:



Notice that the only difference is the proportionality coefficient. This means that the interaction is the same – dilaton field-dilator interaction controlled by the Quantum Lagrangian Principle. The proportionality coefficient ratio is given by the ratio of these two angles a₀ and a₁:


R0 is the age of the Universe times the speed of light (15.82 billion light years) and λ1 is the Compton wavelength of a Hydrogen atom. To be precise, this ratio has to be multiplied by an elastic coefficient of the Fabric of Space. This coefficient is the reason why dilaton and Gravitational waves exist.

The humongous (10³⁶) factor is easy to understand by this simple figure. A more detailed analysis can be found in the pdf containing the theory.

This equation can be simplified for the case where there is no rotation and one of the bodies is much larger than the other (Sun and Mercury for instance) into:


This is the first time a force is actually derived from a purely geometrical theory of the Universe, so it took me some time to understand that this equation has to be integrated upon R (distance) to yield the amount of energy that can be shared into Kinetic and Potential at any position.

Adiabatic integration upon R yields the potential

(3)

This potential is the one used in the Precession of Mercury's Perihelion problem. Applying it to Lagrangian Formalism yields the more appropriate force formula for physical bodies or charges:

Similarly for F one obtains:





Thus F becomes:

Expanding it in powers of



Neglecting terms above the second order


This means that my Gravitational Force does not contains first order dependence upon v/c and also that it perfectly describes all celestial dynamics. It produces the same formula for the Precession of Mercury or Earth or anything else Perihelion…J


In summary, my formula produces not one but TWO formulas for force. One for constructs that cannot change speed (e.g. Light) and another for bodies. They are reproduced without approximations below:


The second formula is used to derive the Gravitational Lensinng (Gerber failed to do so since he only ansatz (guessed) right the first formula).

The more complex formulation for the Force per unit mass (for double jets Black Holes or White Orifices) is given by:

To understand the rest of the Universe, one only need to add the Fundamental Dilator paradigm.

The Fundamental Dilator is a coherence between two deformation states within the 4D spatial manifold. The orientation of the letters in the figure below maps the orientation of the dilator deformation with respect to our 3D Hypersurface. A vertical lettering means that the dilator overlaps minimally with our 3DUniverse (the Fundamental Dilator is quite flat (along the fourth dimension).

The Fundamental Dilator can be represented by this diagram:

Figure 1. Balls Diagram for the Proton, represented by a phase of the Fundamental Dilator.

Cheers,

MP