Comment #2 on the Silver Surfer

Comments #2 on The Silver Surfer and The Hypergeometrical Universe

Anonymous said...

Ok, I see it. I guess it explains the lateral motion. But what about the radial? If one was to take a "surfer" analogy literally, one would have to assume a presence of a force perpendicular to the plain of "surfing". I.e. the only reason a real surfer can move forward is because of a gravity pulling him perpendicular to the surface of water, water resisting it, and a moving wave. So, if we live on the edge of a 4D shockwave, then there should be some force pulling us in the fifth dimension, shouldn't there?

---------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------

First of ALL, let me thank you for asking me such meaningful and thoughtful questions.

This is a wonderful question, Anonymous...

I prayed everyday for such an event, and finally got my prayers answered ...:) He sent me a real Surfer (I mean, a Real Physicist...:)

First, let me remind you that the force on a Surfer is also trying to reach equilibrium or relaxation and that althought there is a Force and there is motion, if one disregards friction between the surfboard and the water and changes in height, there isn't work been done. The Force is just a boundary force or virtual force not unlike the force the ground exerts on us. The same is valid for the hypersuperficial force :).

First I will give you the short answer :

Radial (and lateral) propagation is driven by restoring metric forces (I calculated the 4D space deformation spring constant in my Grand Unification Paper). One can surf a transversal sea wave (where Gravity is the restoring force) or a shock wave (longitudinal wave) from a Supernova explosion (pressure being the restoring force). There are dissipation, acceleration and masses in these analogies, but in my theory there are only dilatons (traveling metric modulations) and dilators (coherences between 4D stationary deformational states). NO accelerations or masses.

This means that we don't necessarily live on the edge of a wave as opposed to being one with the wave. This means that dilators also propagate as any solitonic wave, carrying angular and linear momentum with itself. The breakdown of a Zero Angular and Linear Momentum (at the Beginning of Times) into a very large number of dilators with nonzero Linear and Angular moments is not much different from the problem of searching for your Soulmate...:) or other half... Fortunatelly our other half would be in the other side of the 4D Hypersphere...:) (due to linear momentum)...

I created the Silver Surfer analogy to make it easy for people to understand how motion and tilting of local space are related...It is a usefull paradigm to exemplify my correction to Newton's First Law.

What makes the 3D Hyperspherical Universe and its contents (dilators) to propagate radially is the 4D metric restoring force. There it is, you have what you were looking for... a force after all..>:) But there is no mass to go along with that force... just volumes (displacemente volumes) and no accelerations - just a constant propagation velocity (c)...>:)

Now the long answer.

Let me give you a map of my reply - today I have the Flu and my long answer will be short

As a guide for you to understand better the theory here are the key words:

a) Hypergeometrical Universe Newton's Second Law
b) Quantum Lagrangian Principle and the Wisdom on a Grain of Sand
c) Mention the Hypergeometrical Standard Universe

In the paper about the Hypergeometrical Universe Grand Unification, I used my version of Newton's Second Law to recover all the Forces of Nature (which is just one). At that time, I didn't mentioned the energy from space deformation because I wasn't ready to explain the Hypergeometrical Universe Standard Model.

The Quantum Lagrangian Principle goes hand in hand with the Pseudo Quantization of Time.

The standard model replaces the Quark representation of matter with a Dimensional Chord Representation of Matter. There are several levels of complexity and I have been delving little by little into higher and higher complexities.

If I get better, tomorrow I will post the Twisted Delta Triplets (Delta Hyperon Particles having the same decay channels and different levels of Twist - spin..:)

It is fun.. I hope you will enjoy.

Cheers,

MP

Comments #1 on The Silver Surfer

Comments on The Silver Surfer and The Hypergeometrical Universe

Anonymous said...

Say, there are two observers A and B separated by distance X. The observer A starts motion in direction of B with such an impulse, that by the time he reaches B, his velocity will match the Hubble velocity. What will the observer B see? Will the A continue his motion? Will he slow down and stop?

---------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------

To answer this question the first thing to notice is that one can see A and B on both cross-sections shown above. We will use just the left panel RXYZ cross-section to answer this question.

Let's first check the initial condition where the Fabric of Space is relaxed on both A and B positions, reminding that the Fabric of Space is the wave we ride - where the 3D space and all dilators (matter) are located.

At first sight you might think that the objects on positions A and B are at rest with respect to one another. This would be the case if the 3D Hypersurface were not expanding at the speed of light. In reality they are traveling away from each other at their Hubble velocity. Be their distance X, then they are running away from each other by X/R*c

This can be easily derived if one considers that the radial expansion takes place at the speed of light and the geometry of the figure.

That is why one can only see thing up to one radian in each direction.

The first thing to notice is that it is not clear how to measure the local deformation of the Fabric of Space. This topology (hyperspherical expanding 3D Universe) is connected to the 4D Big Bang proposed in the Cosmogenesis paper.

Under that assumption (Big Bang = 4D explosion), the average velocity on any region of the 3D space is the Hubble velocity, that is, farther regions contains celestial objects that on average run away from us at the Hubble speed. What one can distinguish from one region to another is the width of that distribution. When most of the interactions had taken place a long time ago, the distribution will be sharper. A sharper distribution of receding velocites means that the objects are close to their Fabric of Space relaxed positions.

The comment requires that object A, under the action of an impulse, to reach its Hubble velocity at position B. Velocity is a tilt in the local Fabric of Space and that tilt should make the local normal to be parallel to the Fabric of Space normal at position B. The diagram that would reflect that condition would be the following:

For the distance between the objects to diminish, the tilt (velocity) has to be larger than the Hubble tilt (velocity) between the two objects, thus the proposed experiment doesn't make sense and that is the reason for the paradox.

For sake of simplicity, I made B to be at rest with respect to the Fabric of Space, otherwise both objects would be moving to their resting positions. Notice that this is exactly what the reader asked. This is the relative resting condition, object A has the same inclination (velocity) as it would have at position B (Hubble Velocity). This is the condition for spatial resting that is, one is at rest with respect to the other object.

Other initial conditions or kinematics can be easily inspected by realizing that any local tilt of the Fabric of Space will travel until it relaxes, which is the reason for motion or the Hypergeometrical Universe Newton's Second Law.

If the impulse is such that their paths crosses, their trajectory would be represented by the next diagram:

Object A will pass by object B and will asymptotically reach the positions depicted by A' and B' when the Radius of the Universe reaches infinity or earlier if there were any dissipative process.

There both regions of the Fabric of Space will be relaxed and the objects will run away from each other at their Hubble speed. Notice that their relative speed is always their Hubble speed. The only difference is the unobservable relaxation state of the Fabric of Space.

Up to now the Q (quality factor) of the Fabric of Space has been considered to be infinite.

Cheers,

MP

Encounters of the 4th Kind....:)

Encounters of the 4th Kind....:)

I might have a less than perfect personality, some weakness for chocolate, popovers (Popover Cafe in 87th Street and Amsterdam)...:) but one thing I can never be called: not persistent ...:)

Below is another attempt to an encounter of the 4th Kind and the opening of a communication channel with intelligent people.

Dear Professor Hawking,

I know how to read and read your request for not submitting ideas or crazy theories…

I also know that scientist are extremely impervious to someone’s else ideas.

I also read once that if a “scientist” reads an idea that makes sense its truthfulness will become evident immediately…J

My theory is quite simple, but extensive (it is an extensive argument which includes a new standard model in addition to a Cosmology, Grand Unification and Cosmogenesis). To make life easier, I normally focus my argument only on the Grand Unification and Standard Model.

The theory proposes the 3D Universe as being a lightspeed traveling shock-wave
expanding radially (at the speed of light). Our 3D motions are the just lateral motions and are induced by interaction between dilators. The fourth dimension is not compact. The 3D hypershell is thin, thus no aberration is observed.

Dilators are modeled as coherences between stationary 4D deformational states (on a rotational 4D double potential well). Spin is not an intrinsic degree of freedom, and it is instead considered to be the rotational perpendicular to R (the radial direction) and X(Y or Z).

Electron and Proton are modeled as two phases of this fundamental coherence and they are called the Fundamental Dilator. Neutrons, Hyperons are more complex chords of dimensional notes.

I hope your curiosity would be peaked enough to lead you into inspecting my work.

The work is presented in this blog

http://hypergeometricaluniverse.blogspot.com/

The Grand Unification paper was published in this book:
http://www.amazon.com/Quantization-Astrophysics-Brownian-Motion-Supersymmetry/dp/819021909X/ref=sr_1_1/002-0388091-0808040?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1174235841&sr=8-1

The pdf for Grand Unification is below
http://www.geocities.com/ny2292000/1.pdf

Any feedback, channel of communication or questions would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

MP

--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------

**Automatic Reply**

Your email regarding "Ideas and the need for a Giordano Bruno" has been received.

Professor Hawking very much regrets that due to the severe limitations he works under, and the huge amount of mail he receives, he may not have time to compose a reply. All e-mail is read, however we do not have the resources to deal with the many specific scientific enquiries and theories we receive.

Please see the website http://www.hawking.org.uk/ for more information about Professor Hawking, his life and his work.

Yours
faithfully

Sam Blackburn

Graduate Assistant to
Professor S W
Hawking CH CBE FRS

Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical
Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge,
CB3 0WA.
United Kingdom.

http://www.hawking.org.uk/

Going NOWHERE Fast

Going NOWHERE Fast...:)


Well, well....:) Now you can stretch your brain a little more and understand what Science is grasping at straws to explain... The Supersolidity Effect..

Not unlike in the case of liquid helium 4 superfluidity, the thought constraints due to the Equivalence Principle between Gravitational and Inertial Masses created the conjecture of solid superfluidity..

This is a much simpler problem if one understands quantum mechanics, motion (accordingly to my model) and simple topology.

Supersolidity is the idea that a solid can freely pass through itself ??? whatever that means.
The experiment that gave rise to such a contrived idea is the following:
a) Pick up a bucket of solid helium 4
b) Rotate it around its axis and cool it down further.
c) At a given temperature, the bucket of Helium 4 suddenly starts rotating faster....:)

The simple-minded explanation is that somehow the core of the solid helium rotating volume simply stopped rotating while the exterior crust started rotating faster to conserve angular momentum.

This is an idea with very large holes..>:)
a) First, for the middle core to stop rotating, it has to receive a torque..>:) supposelly the same torque that makes the exterior crust to rotate faster afterwards... THE OBVIOUS QUESTION IS WHY??????

WHY WOULD SUCH TORQUE BE CREATED?

I am not going to waste time thinking along those lines...

Quantum Mechanics provides a much simpler although extremely surprising (for the people who doesn't know the Hypergeoemtrical Universe theory) answer.

As the temperature goes down, the wavefunction defining each atom in the spinning bucket gets wider. This means that any observable quantity has to be the result of averaging this wavefunction with the observable operator. In the case of velocity, the operator is the inclination of the local space. I will not try to draw a Mexican Hat or a twisted Mexican Hat...:) it is too difficult...

I can tell you in simple words... As the wavefunction gets wider, it starts probing positions on the other side of the center of rotation, that is, it probes motion with components both positve and negative. This averages the state of motion to a lower effective velocity. As the temperature goes down further the masses positioned close to the center of rotation changes their state of motion into no motion and that state doesn't change with an increase in angular velocity.

This means at that lower temperature, the boson solid loses moment of inertia but doesn't lose gravitational mass. It also doesn't lose inertial mass for linear motion!!!!!

This decouples Gravitational Mass from Inertial Mass and Linear Inertial Mass from Rotational Inertial Mass...:) QED.

If you now ask me what would happen in a bosonic celestial body that is close to zero kelvin... I would say it would rotate at the speed of light...:) No ifs or buts...

If you read my theory you will realize that there are other ways to reach things deemed impossible by our Science....:)

Rebel against that... There is a lot to lose if one stops dreaming, but to dream that things are in a way they are not is not conducive to a great human adventure...

Cheers,

MP

The Silver Surfer and The Hypergeometrical Universe

The Silver Surfer and The Hypergeometrical Universe

I am back after a long hiatus due to life...:)

In the next few blogs I will try to clarify some aspects of motion. It would be a good time to reread my prior blog about Why do things move?.

The trouble started when Einstein proposed the Principle of Equivalence between Inertial and Gravitational Masses. Every time someone of great stature proposes something, that becomes either a beacon of light in the darkness of our ignorance or a tremendous hindrance to real progress..>:)

In this specific case, I believe it became a tremendous hindrance to thought.

I mentioned in the past that inertial and gravitational masses are not the same....or better one can have one without having the other... or have both for some kind of motion and not for another...:)

In any event, they are not the same and I will demonstrate that in the next blog as well as hinting how to move at the speed of light sidewise...:) that is, within our 3D Universe... :)

But first, let's address the Silver Surfer, the alien looking alien that surfs the Universe in a surfboard...:)

It is a handy concept the idea that if the Universe is a 3D Hyperspherical Spatial Disturbance (Wave) traveling at the speed of light radially, we would all be surfing that wave...:)

As you know the Radial direction is preferential but non-observable, since we can only measure relative motion with the 3D Hypersurface. On the left you will find the Silver Surfer just sitting on its board while the Hyperspherical Shock Wave Universe drags him along...:)

As I mentioned in the blog Why do things move, motion is a relaxation of local deformation of 4D space. A local deformation is created through the interaction between matter. Once the interaction vanishes, one is left with a state of deformation or motion which will relax until it reaches the region where is velocity matches its Hubble velocity. At that point, the surfer will be on the situation shown on the left...:)

Similarly one can envision the surfer riding a local dilaton field (local force). Under those conditions, the local space will be slightly deformed.

In the left picture we can see it traveling to the left...:)

Similarly, one can travel to the right...:)

These pictures should provide a clear picture...:) of what motions means within the framework of my theory: Motion is the relaxation of local 4D space deformation. 4D Space deformation is created by interaction between matter (dilators).

Now you have the basic understanding that will allow you to understand the difference between gravitational mass and inertial mass. That will be covered next..>:)

Cheers,

MP