Hyperon's Final Chapter

Hyperon's Final Chapter

The final Chapter on the Hyperon's Crazy Bunch will have to wait until the end of the week. I am currently blogging the reasons for the strange behavior in this Family...:)

For instance, the Delta Triplets (same mass for Plus, Minus and Zero) have spin 3/2 and decay into the same channel (DeltaZero -> Neutron + Pion Zero) as LambdaZero (spin 1/2). How come two particles triplets, with the same masses, would decay into the same products and still differ in spin..:)

That is a simple problem in the logical framework of the hypergeometrical universe.

Simple reasoning about the spins associated with sub-coherences (sub-chords) explains away the differences and why they can decay into the same channel.

In the prior The Deltas and their Twisted Minds blog, I draw some green and some red on the sub-chord to associated the different colors to clock-wise and anti-clockwise spinning. Difficulties in formatting precluded me from making this point there (at that blog)...:) I will never get back to that table again (formatting using Google table is very complicated)..:)

All this amazing bits of insight will become clear as I blog this family...:) You just have to be patient. It takes time to write this things on my spare time..:)
Other important information that will come out of this picture is the WHY they have their masses and that without invoking Higgs Bosons and Supercomputers...:) Just a simple spreadsheet...:) It is very disappointing...:)

Peter Higgs has a model in which particle masses arise in a beautiful, but complex, progression. He starts with a particle that has only mass, and no other characteristics, such as charge, that distinguish particles from empty space. We can call his particle H. H interacts with other particles; for example if H is near an electron, there is a force between the two. H is of a class of particles called "bosons". We first attempt a more precise, but non-mathematical statement of the point of the model; then we give explanatory pictures.

This might sound extremely smart and confusing...:) but it is only confusing...:) ...

In my theory, which already Unified All the Forces, mass is simply a 3D projection of a 4D displacement volume. Of course, as you know from the Hypergeometrical Newtons's Second Law, I had to change Newton's paradigm of Force /Mass/Acceleration to Stress/Area/Strain.

This simple change in paradigm eliminates the concept of Mass while keeping 3D "area" projection as a proxy of inertia. There is not need to smoke stuff and imagine some kind of massless particle linked by continuous exchange of virtual particle to anchor itself into the Universe. I really think it would be stupid to consider this after understanding my paradigm, but I respect other people need to continue doing what they know how to do and make a living...:) The String Theorists will continue stringing, the conjecturists will conjecture ad infinitum...:)

The only problem is that the future of Mankind is dependent upon some degree of efficiency. We have to grow up in wisdom, technology and knowledge or we will be decimated by some meteor (2036, I believe), raising seas, disruption of distribution systems, production systems or just killed off my rampaging robots (The Terminator..:).....

There are many problems which would go away with some little more knowledge and you need to be alive to make a living...;) (this is directed towards the stringing theorists and conjecturists...:)

Had Newton discovered this geometrical paradigm during his lifetime we would be exploring the Universe in spacecrafts at this time...:)

Please spread the word about this blog and this theory. It should have a day in the Sun...:)

I am doing my part...:) do yours...

If mankind minus one were of one opinion, then mankind is no more justified in silencing the one than the one - if he had the power - would be justified in silencing mankind.- John Stuart Mill

Cheers,

MP

The Deltas and their Twisted Minds

Spin Differences between Hyperons

The hyperons below differs only by the spinning direction of their sub-coherences.

Hyperon Name	Symbol	Mass (MeV/c2)	Decay Process	Spin	Coherence Lifetime	Coherence Decomposition
DeltaPlus	Δ+	1232	π+ + n	3/2	6×10-24	(0,2/3,1/3). (0,-1/3,1/3). (2/3,2/3,-1/3). (0,-2/3,-1/3). (0,-1/3,1/3)
DeltaPlus	Δ+	1232	π0 + p	3/2	6×10-24	(2/3,2/3,-1/3) .(0,1/3,2/3) . (0,-1/3,-2/3)
DeltaZero	Δ0	1232	π0 + n	3/2	6×10-24	(2/3,2/3,-1/3). (0,-2/3,-1/3). (0,-1/3,1/3). (0,1/3,2/3) . (0,-1/3,-2/3)
DeltaZero	Δ0	1232	π- + p	3/2	6×10-24	(0,-2/3,-1/3). (0,1/3,-1/3). (2/3,2/3,-1/3)
DeltaMinus	Δ-	1232	π- + n	3/2	6×10-24	(0,-2/3,-1/3). (0,1/3,-1/3). (2/3,2/3,-1/3). (0,-2/3,-1/3). (0,-1/3,1/3)
LambdaZero	Λ0	1115.7	π- + p	1/2	2.60×10-10	(0,-2/3,-1/3). (0,1/3,-1/3). (2/3,2/3,-1/3)
LambdaZero	Λ0	1115.7	πo + n	1/2	2.60×10-10	(0,1/3,2/3) . (0,-1/3,-2/3). (2/3,2/3,-1/3). (0,-2/3,-1/3). (0,-1/3,1/3)
SigmaPlus	Σ+	1189.4	π0 + p	1/2	0.8×10-10	(2/3,2/3,-1/3). (0,1/3,2/3). (0,-1/3,-2/3)
SigmaPlus	Σ+	1189.4	π+ + n	1/2	0.8×10-10	(2/3,2/3,-1/3). (0,-2/3,-1/3). (0,-1/3,1/3). (0,2/3,1/3). (0,-1/3,1/3)

Hyperon's Crazy Brothers

Hyperon's Crazy Brothers

Every family has a problem child, the Hyperons are not different...:) In fact, they are all dysfunctional, mass challenged, always ready to blow up into pieces...:) Very, very dramatic bunch of highly excited particles...:)

I will be dissing the Hyperon Family for a while so I will use the gossip standard and will stay in this blog a little... If you read it once, read it again, I might have divulged more sordid details about the Family...:)

Let's remember what the Singing Universe paradigm is. We represented the fundamental particles (proton and electron) as two phases of a dimensional volumetric displacement chord (like a musical chord, just instead of sound, you hear dimensional (metric) modulations).

We introduced some of the members of the Hyperon Family (some of them might not be formally a member of the family, e.g. proton, electron). Consider the proton and electron as the stem cells that generated the whole family.

All particles are just combinations of those chords. I should remind you the Balls Diagram and the Coherence Diagram for the Pion Minus:

Below is the amazing Pion Minus complex chord which is actually composed of four fundamemtal chords or 16 notes.



This complex coherence or chord can also be shown as:

I am not a musician, but you can read the chords as an electron chord, followed by a electron-positron transmutation note (half-neutrino chord), followed by a positron-electron transmutation note (another half-neutrino), followed by another electron chord, followed by an electron-proton transmutation note and lastly and proton-electron transmutation note.

The last note recovers the first state of the coherence and completes the Pion Minus Chord.

As you can see, the Pion Minus ate two electrons and a positron and acquired even more mass than one would expect from that. He is really Mass Challenged...:)

Let analyze how could the Pion Minus become soooooo Fat...:) while eating just two electrons and a positron...:) ... You know, each one of those are only 0.510998918 MeV/c^2 ...Eating like a bird, that is what he said, but that would only add to 3 x 0.51=1.53 MeV/c^2. The Pion Minus is actually 139.57018 MeV/c^2... He might binge while sleeping... that is the only explanation...:)

There might be another one. When Pion Minus came to us (Jenny Craig), he was FAT and couldn't figure out why...:) The first thing to remember about Mass (3D Mass) is that: it is not what you eat that matters, it is how do you project what you eat in the 3D Hyperspherical Universe... simple as that..:) I am sure you all are thinking about how to loose those pesky extra pounds...:) Just hide them in the Hyperspace...:)

To understand how that extra mass appeared, let's see the Coherence Diagram again (I might start calling this a Chord Diagram in the future).

The first chord is an electron chord followed by an electron-positron transmutation chord, then a positron chord followed by a positron-electron chord, then a second electron chord followed by an electron-proton transmutation chord and a proton-electron transmutation chord.

The electron-positron transmutation chords are 3D spatial rotations--- they correspond to a transition between the states (0,-2/3,-1/3) and (0,-1/3,-2/3)--- of the dilator while the proton-electron/electron-proton transmutation chords have a more complex meaning.

Notice that I changed the secondary axis of spinning - the dilator spins around the axis perpendicular to R and z.

To find out what is eating at Pion Minus we will have to dissect his ugly cousin: The Neutron...:)

More to come...:) Come back to this posting often - it will keep changing for some time still... These Hyperons are just crazy...:)

Cheers,

MP

Newton's Third Law

Newton's Third Law

By now, I am sure you people are upset that I have been picking on poor Newton. It just happens that his work is fundamental and revising it is a sign of respect and something I couldn't avoid.

The last law states that the force sensed by two interacting bodies are equal and in opposing directions (signs).

This is the easiest one to recast.

I will be terse and brief since the reproduction of the forces is enough to show that they have the same value and opposite signs. I will only give you the physical (geometrical) interpretation of the Quantum Lagrangian Principle.

The picture above displays the Universe on the RX cross section (right panel in the Hypergeometrical Universe Icon). The age of the Universe is around 15 billion light years and lambda is the Compton wavelength of an atomic mass unit particle, so this is not draw to the correct scale..:)

I show two bodies about to step one de Broglie wavelength in the Universe lightspeed expansion.

It is impossible to draw things correctly and still be didactic. A large mass body, represented on the right, will have a very small Compton wavelength. In my calculations, I represent their wavelegnth as being zero for simplicity. Under those conditions the single dilator (one a.m.u. mass) interacts with a continuous field (it still oscillates but their maximae are too close together to affect the calculations). I just had to calculate the shift on the next maximae generated by the dilator along the radial direction. In the absence of interaction, the dilator's field would have a maximum exactly along the radial line. In the presence of the interacting body, that maximum shifts sidewise and one just has to calculate a dilaton gradient and equate it to zero (l'Hospital rule..:).

The effect of being a large (macroscopic) body is two-fold: it makes its effective Compton wavelenght to be zero and it scales the intensity by the number of dilators it contains. One kilogram of anything (mass or charge) would contain 1000 Avogrado's number of dilators. Thus the local dilaton field, in the proximity of the large body, would be much larger and the shift would be inversely proportional to that number of dilators.

Since the shift is proportional to the acceleration, one can see that the acceleration in the larger body would be inversely proportional to its "mass".

That should be enough for this law. I am eager to go back to the Hyperons. Please, feel free to ask any questions.

Cheers,

MP

Newton's Second Law

Newton's Second Law

I had to reinterpret Newton's Second Law in the Hypergeometrical Universe to recover the Equations of Motion. This might hurt your Brain, but I promised it will be worthile...:)

The first thing I have to point out is that Newton's Law and everything you know about the Universe lies on the right panel of the Hypergeometrical Universe Icon (above, staring you in the face...:) I also should remind you to read the Blog - The Force be with you, Not...:) There, I mentioned that the correct paradigm doesn't have force, mass, charge.

The right panel contains only an unobservable absolute time, x and t ' and x' (I didn't draw the x' to avoid confusion and to emphasize that different inertial reference frames have different time projections t and t').

In my paper, I expressed Newton's equation as:

This is already a geometrization of Newton's equation but it is still impure, since it contains spurious concepts like Mass. The concept of Force as being any interaction that twists alpha (twists the Fabric of Space) is already present!!!!!!

To achieve the appropriate paradigm just divide both sides by the mass and you will have acceleration.

Similarly one has an acceleration for the left panel:
First think about what an equation is. If you place two identical objects separated by an equal sign (e.g. 2=2) you end up with an equation but it contains no information. It is a simple tautology.

For an equation to be non-trivial it has to relate two different paradigms (e.g. 1+1=2). This contains information about the addition of integers, or unitary segments, or unidimensional vectors) etc...

Newton's equation does just that, it maps a vector Force (which lives in a different space from Mass and Acceleration) and maps their products in a Natural Law. Mass is a scaling factor (extensive property) in the same way that a Strain is scaled by the area where that strain occurred to give the causing Stress.

In the Hypergeometrical Universe, the Force (Stress) is the same on both panels. This paradigm can be easily modified if we realize that Force (Stress) causes the rate of deformation of the local Fabric of Space, being the Mass an scaling factor. Under this paradigm, instead of acceleration we have Strain which eventually should be scaled up by the appropriate "area" to yield the total Stress.

The equation below showcase this paradigm: This is Newton's equation in a purely geometrical perspective. There is still a generalized force (stress) which is alright, since the stress is explained by the Quantum Lagrangian Principle governing the position of dilators to follow the constructive interference of dilaton fields.
I will write the equation 4D Stress as:
with strain given by:
notice that the proper time is dimensionalized by its scaling with c (lightspeed). As you can see, Mo is the projection of an unitary 4D area (or 4D Displacement Volume). If you call 3D Stress as F you would have recover formally Newton's Second Law. F and M are just Words nothing else.

In my paper, I used the Stress4D to calculate both Gravitation and Electromagnetism. Where you see Area4D= One, I read Area4D= One Atomic Mass Unit (a Hydrogen atom for Gravitation or the Fat Electron for electromagnetism).

If you remember that all maximae displacement volumes of the fundamental dilator are performed in phase with the dilaton field, it becomes clear that the displacement at the Proton phase adds in phase with the displacement at the Electron phase, thus the dilator has a Area4D equal to an Hydrogen Atom (a spin zero Hydrogen Atom).

This might make your Brain spins but take my word for it, or better don't take my word for it and check the logic for inconsistencies. A clean mind is a sign of mental disease...:)

There is a reason for Newton's madness. He lived in a World of charges, masses, forces. Specially charges are evil...:) One cannot write from Gauss Electrostatics equation a simple equation for acceleration that doesn't depend upon the probe charge. This is solved by the Fat Electron paradigm working together with the Quantum Lagrangian Principle. With those simple concepts, I created the equivalent 4D-Mass or Area4D of an electron or proton to be one a.m.u. which was used within the left panel to calculate force. Thus the 4D Mass of an electron is the same as the 4D mass of a proton: one a.m.u.

Refinements are associated with the rotational motion and were considered in the paper (gyromagnetic ratio comes out of that refinement).

Well, that is that. Newton's Second Law, a Natural Law has a different interpretation in the Hypergeometrical Universe.

I hope Mr. Scientist will soon ask me some questions before I forget this subject. I am moving out of this paradigm pretty soon...:) By the way, I called Ms. Slack (this is not a joke) from Columbia U. to ask who is the person in charge of the physics departmental seminars. No answer yet, but I am cutting her some slack...:) ( I couldn't resist the joke)...:) I will call her back next week...:)

Cheers,

MP

Of Mice and Men...

Of Mice and Men

You have been reading about my audacity - The Balls Diagram..:), intellectual courage and other bravados... It might be time for me to be real....:)

I work very hard, learned a lot in life, have strong ideals and am extremely driven... Like to try to fool myself in thinking I am made of stainless steel...:)

I know that that is not the case, but it helps in trying to get things done...

As you know, I wrote a lot here and there and everywhere about this theory. I've just had to do it, since I couldn't find any resistence to it, nobody ever said anything I couldn't answer and the theory has the most aesthetic beauty and simplicity. When you see the Universe in such a different way, if you really are a true Mankind cardmember carrying, you would like to make this idea part of the collective knowledge soup.... The stuff we use to make the future ... to reach the Undiscovered Continent... This is not to say that I am messianic and am here to deliver the truth...(like Steve Colbert)...:) but this is to say I would like to voice the idea ... gingerly if necessary... but express it ..

In the past, at the beginning of this blog, I tried to contact the leaders in this field. Gingerly sent them one email asking for any comments. Never received any acknowledgement and cowardly let things stay that way...

After getting the idea published in the Quantization in Astrophysics book, I though that maybe it is time to try to engage someone and maybe get a comment or two... or in the best of the Universe, have an actual vigorous scientific debate...:)

Enboldened by the publication, I made another gingerly effort and send this email to Dr Kay, an Astrophysics professor from Columbia University.

From: MP
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 3:47 PM
To: 'lkay@barnard.edu'
Subject: Hypergeometrical Universe

Dear Dr.Kay,

I created a new theory - The Hypergeometrical Universe, which describes interactions (forces) and particles in purely geometrical terms. It also provides a simple and unified approach to all the forces.

I would like to give a talk on the subject such as to obtain some feedback.

The work has been published in a collaborative book on Quantization in Astrophysics.
http://www.hypergeometricaluniverse.com/Quantization.pdf

Currently, I am bloging the Hypergeometrical Standard Model where I describe the Hyperons in terms of dilators (metric modulators) and their respective dilaton (traveling metric modulations) chords. The blog site is given by:
http://hypergeometricaluniverse.blogspot.com/

I am not in academia anymore so it would be quite stimulating to hear someone's else opinion.

Regards,

MP

The email was sent on February, 8th. It took me a week to muster the courage to call and follow up. This is not a strong bravado..:) It turns out that I am just human and try as much as I can to avoid disappointment.

I called and prefaced the conversation by expressing that I was checking to see if she received the email... these days, the spam program eliminate many emails... and so and so....:) eventually to mention that I was looking for some feedback, maybe the opportunity to present the idea in any shape or form..:) ... a very humble approach... I am extremely considered and hate to impose on people...

Eventually, Dr. Kay utter these words in a tense but terse manner:

"Not the right person to talk about that.."

I said thanks and that was that...

I am reasonably smart and realized that she sensed conversing about that idea as a burden and did not request her to give me another potential poor soul to take her place....

I was disappointed with the scientist - not with this scientist in particular - but with the lack of intellectual curiosity or open-mindness that one would expect a scientist to have...

By all measures, I believe that the Hypergeometrical Universe Theory is a consistent logical framework. I would hope that a professional scientist would devote some five to ten minutes to investigate it...:)

Disappointed with the scientist but never with Science...:) and no Bravados today...:)

Cheers,

MP

PS- After writing this soul baring blog, I realized that maybe
"Not the right person to talk about that.."
doesn't mean
"Not the right person to talk about that crackpot theory of yours.."
as I feared and just means "Not the right person to talk about departamental talks.."

On that positive note, I will go back and follow up again... and pretend I am not just a big pussycat... :)

Newton's First Law...

Newton's First Law

I mentioned that I was afraid that my legacy would be my Balls Diagram...:) but I am afraid I will have to challenge Newton's Laws also and them only my Intellectual Courage or Audacity will be remembered...:)

First let's review Newton's Laws with the help of Wikipedia:

The Three Laws of Motion
Newton's Laws of Motion describe the acceleration of massive objects. The modern understanding of Newton's three laws of motion is:

First Law
If no external force acts on a particle, then it is possible to select a set of reference frames observed from which the particle is seen to move without any change in its velocity. These reference frames are called inertial reference frames.

Second Law
When observed from an inertial reference frame, the vector sum of all forces on a particle is proportional to the rate of change of its linear momentum with respect to time. Momentum is the product of mass and velocity. (In special relativity, a third factor is included — the Lorentz factor.) Notice that this is only true when the observation is made from an inertial reference frame, and since an inertial reference frame is defined by the first law, asking a proof of the first law from the second law is a fallacy.

Third Law
Whenever A exerts a force on B, B simultaneously exerts a force on A with the same magnitude in the opposite direction. The strong form of the law further postulates that these two forces act along the same line.

The first Law was tackled in my paper where I provided a simple and clear explanation why things that are moving will keep moving at the same speed if there are no forces acting upon them. Of course, since my theory is geometrical in nature, that explanation will have to have space, space deformation and space relaxation. I will replay the argument here in a slightly syncopated fashion due the juxtaposition of the three laws and my effort to address each on its time..:)

Here is the plot that explains why Newton's first law exists:

At time t1 the 4D radius of the Universe was c.t1. Let's say that a force was momentarily applied to a body (initially at rest with the Fabric of Space) and it shots off at angle alpha1. It is clear that in this R versus X cross section of the Universe that the angle alpha1 is given by artan (v/c). It is also clear that after some time, at time t2 the angle alpha2 with the perpendicular to the Fabric of Space (relaxed 3D hypersurface) is smaller due to relaxation/motion.

I proposed that this relaxation process is the reason for motion in my paper and replicate the argument here for your enjoyment.

This takes care of the first law. The second law has to do with Inertia.

I will tackle the Newton's Second Law tomorrow. The clue is that when you see a law your have to question it..:) Be a rebel... think...:) There are so many physical questions behind the simplest mathematical equation....

Cheers,

MP

The Balls Diagram

The Balls Diagram

As you know, didactics requires some memorable associations and I thougtht about this one while listenig to Chris Matthews' Hardball. Valentine's Day was also in my mind...:)

So let's learn some physics up, Fellas.:)

The Balls Diagram has been shown for the initial particles of the Hyperon Family and even though they should be self-evident, I thought that it would be worthwhile to spend a blog on it...:)

Let's take the Coherence Diagram for the Pion Minus for simplicity and its corresponding Balls Diagram.

Pion Minus

Below is the amazing Pion Minus chord which is composed of four chords or 16 notes.

As you should know by now, the Coherence Diagram showcases a bunch of sequential transitions among different 4D stationary deformational states. As you can see I recasted the states in terms 2/3 and 1/3 and their negative values. The meaning of these states depends not only upon their displacement axis lenght amplitude but also in the phase of coherence. This means that event though the lowest state of the left well (0,-2/3,-1/3) is being associated with the electron state (3D projection of the 4D displacement volume proportional to the 3D mass of an electron), it can also represent a positron (0,2/3,1/3).

Notice that the Zero is in bold, meaning that the axis perpendicular to the Radial Direction R and the axis X is being defined as the axis of spinning. It was choosen like that to provide the smallest 4D volume of Rotation on the Neutron Decay equation. The reasoning is slightly convoluted, but that is how complex assignments are made.

Neutron -> Proton + Electron + Anti-Neutrino
(2/3,-1/3,-1/3) -> (2/3, 1/3,0) + (0,-2/3,-1/3)
-> (2/3, 2/3,-1/3) + (0,-2/3,-1/3) + (0,-1/3,1/3)

We presented the Electron with the smallest 4D volume which would imply that the axis of revolution will be perpendicular to the smallest axis (x-axis has zero displacement axis length). Notice that the electron-proton dilator is the fundamental coherence, thus any spinning will have to keep its axis or spinning. The final assignment with respect to which spinning axis one should use is still under discussion in my mind.

An alternative assignment is:
Neutron -> Proton + Electron + Anti-Neutrino
(2/3,-1/3,-1/3) -> (2/3, 1/3,0) + (0,-2/3,-1/3)
-> (2/3, 2/3,-1/3) + (0,-2/3,-1/3) + (0,-1/3,1/3)

This assignment uses the smallest axis of the Proton instead. In fact, this seems to be a better assigment since is also makes the lowest volume for the Neutron. Although the electon would be spinning around a larger axis, the volume associated with the other two axes is zero or thereabouts. This is easy to see if you forget the 4D ellipsoid of revolution for a second and think about the particle as a parallellepiped with three axis. In the case of the electron one of them has zero lenght, thus the area associated with it would be zero, thus spinning it wouldn't give you that much volume.

This is a better assignment after all, thus disregard some bolding in the wrong axis until I correct this mistake... As you know, one has to have Balls to accepts one's mistakes...:)
Courage will also suffice....:)

Notice that the double potential well is more complex than I let you know. The choice of which axis you are spinning breaks down the spinning degeneracy of the problem further. I will overlook this now, otherwise I am sure you will blow a gasket...:)

Notice that an alternative view of the Neutron Coherence or transition state is a dilator quadrupole.

This is consistent with all the other also having the smallest 4D Rotational Volume and thus 3D masses. That is why I wrote the equation as such. Different axis of rotation would result in a different mass and be recognized as a different particle, made up by a set of different quarks by our creative scientists...:)

Now that we understand a little more about the Coherence Diagram, one can ask questions about why the two Electron states are not degenerate. They differ just by a spatial rotation (y into z and z into y)...:) The reason is simple even though state is isotropic or quasi-isotropic, there is a difference in pointing a 4D spatial deformation in one direction or another. To change the direction of deformation one has to do work, dynamically. That dynamic effort (as opposed to adiabatic work) is responsible for the dynamical symmetry breakdown. It is not a energy difference that makes this states different, it is the fact that the dilator has to physically redirect itself and that takes time. So the states (0,-2/3,-1/3) don't differ in energy (4D volume) but they are distinct.

The same is valid for the muon and tau neutrinos associated with the proton side. I did not refer to them yet since I did not mention any decaying particle that emits muon and tau neutrinos. I will do so later.

This dynamic state change takes time and that is happening while the dilator is rotating (spinning) on the 4D space.

This complex coherence or chord can also be shown as a Balls Diagram:

Let analyse events Ball by Ball or note by note, if you so wish...:) Let's start with the electron chord. Starting from the top as a musician would say..>:)

The Pion chord is composed of two electron chords, one positron chord, one eletron-positron transmutation note, one positron-electron transmutation note, one eletron-proton transmutation note and finally a proton-electron transmutation note.

If you look close enough at the Coherence Diagram, you will be able to see which states are involved with each of these transmutation notes.

Let's start with the Electron-Positron transmutation note. This note corresponds to two arrows in our coherence diagram. The first arrow starts at the (0,-2/3,-1/3) and ends on (0,-1/3,-2/3). The second arrow starts at (0,-1/3,-2/3) and ends back on (0,-2/3,-1/3). This transition has the physical meaning of a spatial rotation in 3D and has angular momentum associate with it.

The time it takes to make this 3D spatial rotation is such that the tunneling goes from contraction to expansion, that is, the displacement volume goes from (0,-2/3,-1/3) to (0,2/3,1/3), or the state goes from electron to positron and it is also the time or thereabouts it takes to do a 180 degrees spinning 4D rotation. This has to be the case otherwise one wouldn't see that positive charge component of the chord. The meaning of thereabouts is because the 180 degrees 4D spinning cycle is not the same as the 180 degrees 3D rotational cycle. This causes the positron to be crocked...:) As you know, this is a local deformation of the fabric of space and corresponds to a virtual velocity. These virtual velocities are the spring that stores the nuclear energy. It is not necessary fields, gluons and any other sticky crap...:)

One should eventually define the exact shape of this potential well and the "Schrodinger" equation for the dilator. I will do that in the appropriate time and this is quite a simple task within this logical framework.

Now let's set our sights back onto the Balls Diagram. The first four balls are the four notes of the electron chord. The blue line between the last electron ball and the first positron ball is blue for a reason....:) It is blue because it corresponds to a transmutation note and it is equal to the positron-electron transmutation note. Symmetry tells me that they are identical, that is, it takes the same time to make each 90 degrees spatial rotation.

I should mention that upside particles are normal particles while upside down are anti-particles (dilators with a 180 degrees dephase). This means that one electron contracts 4D space while a positron expands 4D space.

There is an important feature that people might be missing. Sidewise particles are not seen on the 3D Universe. These states have little aberration (height) along the radial direction, so when they spin sidewise, they have no interaction with the 3D Universe.

Of course, eventually the energy stored in those motions survive in the form of flying products. The energy is stored in the Fabric of Space twisting, the transmutation chords (an electron-positron plus a positron-electron transmutation notes together make up a neutrino chord).

The electron-proton plus proton-electron-proton notes unravel together with the extra positron-electron pair such as to deform space enough to propel the remaining particle at their emission speeds.

That is the meaning of the Balls Diagram and a more detailed explanation on the nature of matter.

If you want to understand someting deeper, read my old blog on the Meaning of Material Existence.

Feynman created his Feynman diagrams, Einstein left us with Einstein's equations, Newton left Newton's Laws... I am starting to worry about my legacy...:)

Good forbid it from being my .... :)

Cheers,

MP

The Capital Sins

The Capital Sins

There are a few Sins that are relevant to Science. The one that I believe is most damaging is Vanity. It demonstrates itself in two forms: People will say that something they couldn't understand is extremely difficult - by definition - and the other is that they will pursue their extremely complex model as opposed to try to understand someone's else simpler paradigm...:)

I created a simple explanation for the Universe. It has been said that it could never be done... It has been said that it might be explainable only by a theory from the 23rd Century..:) People told us that for that they (Einstein) would have to read God's mind....etc

What if the Universe is just a Flying Orchestra where each member plays a simple tune and they always play in tune with the surrounding music (Quantum Lagrangian Principle)...:) Would you give this theory a chance to be published or heard...:)

Vanity has precluded that from happening and has precluded Mr./Mrs. Scientist (imitating a South Park's General) from giving me the time of the day...:) They have been too busy making their Rube Goldberg conjectures...:)

Rube Goldberg (1883-1970) was a Pulitzer Prize winning cartoonist, sculptor, and author.

Reuben Lucius Goldberg (Rube Goldberg) was born in San Francisco. His father, a practical man, insisted he go to college to become an engineer. After graduating from University of California Berkeley, Rube went to work as an engineer with the City of San Francisco Water and Sewers Department.

He continued drawing, and after six months convinced his father that he had to work as an artist. He soon got a job as an office boy in the sports department of a San Francisco newspaper. He kept submitting drawings and cartoons to his editor, until he was finally published.

He got published...so there is hope...:)

I called this a simple theory and stated the argument in a consistently clear and simple fashion. The argument is extensive because it has to be. If I tell you that the Universe is vibrating you would properly call me stupid... If I represent the Hyperon Family as Dimensional Vibrations, you will eventually and I say eventually call me smart...:) Vanity and lack of intellectual courage will always preclude early adoption..:)

This is just the difference between half-baked and fully-baked ideas.

Crackpots and scientists will come with half baked ideas and that will always be fine. I, as a layman in this field, had to come up with the whole Chimichanga...:)

I hope you are enjoying the Feast...:)

Cheers,

MP

Pion Plus and The Philosopher's Stone

Pion Plus and The Transmutation of Matter


Some time ago I mentioned that I would deliver a Pedra filosofal or the Philosopher's Stone, the Alchemist dream of transmutation

Before you start making your plans for a rich retirement in the Bahamas, you might as well relax with some Pion Plus Music...:) There will be plenty of transmutation there...:)

Here are the decay equations associated with the Pion Brothers:

Let's start with the Coherence Diagram containing the Dimensional Chords:


One notices that the spectral content remains the same, that means that the decay products will differ only by phase. The front laden anti-proton to positron transmutation note generates the first positron of the sequence. Figure below shows this complex chord in a simpler manner:


If one compares it with the Pion Minus presented before, it is clear that they differ just by a phase. In the Pion Minus the initial phase is a electron while in the Pion Plus is is a positron. The phase difference is just 180 degrees tunelling.

Below is the Coherence Diagram for the Pion Zero:


and its corresponding balls diagram...:)

You might notice that the Pion Zero looks like two justaposed electron-positron pairs of notes. You might ask how those two notes pairs don't anihiliate or collapse? There is a simple answer, they are not in the same time, that is, they are sequential notes. The other half of the answer has to do with angular momentum, for anti notes to continuing existing or be something in life, they have to carry a total momentum different than zero. The idea is that if in the electron note one compresses 4D space and in the positron note one dilates the same space by the same amount, the net work is zero - work, energy and deformational or twisting are the same. This would mean that the note sequence could be eliminated or added without changing particle. Now if the zero note pair has angular momentum, then it cannot be eliminated willy-nilly.

Sooner than later, I will explain where is the nuclear energy, although as I mentioned before, I already told you. When I state that I will explain it, I mean, I will make it patentedly clear to a four years old child....:)

There will be more on transmutation notes in the near future.

Cheers,

MP

The Singing Paradigm

The Singing Paradigm

It is NOT everyday you witness the birth of a new paradigm. Today is one of those days.

I have been explaining the theory bit by bit... and cementing each new layer with the a new nuance of my vision of the Universe.

The initial cinder blocks of this new paradigm were the proposed hyperspherical shock wave Universe topology. That was supported by Cosmological observations, like the equating of the Cosmic Microwave Background with a Doppler Shifted Big Bang Gamma Ray Burst.

At that point, Life imitated Art and I realized that one can only reach the Alpha Quadrant (45 degrees of the Cosmological Angle in each direction) and that by traveling at the speed of light forever. One can see one radian or the Beginning of the Universe or thereabouts.

Amusingly enough the Big Bang occurred in each and every point of this 3D Universe and that is a simple consequence of the topology....:) This means the the initial heat and energy that were bursting at the time of the Big Bang from the chair where you are sitting right now is reaching a position one radian from it (Cosmological Angle - see figure at the top of the blog) at this time while the energy that left that point is reaching you right now...:)

In this topology you are always at the center of your Universe and that is valid for all and everybody...:) A nice trick just for the Egocentric people around..:)

The second layer on this house was the Grand Unification of Gravitation and Electromagnetism and summary dismissal of the remaining obscure forces. In time, I will further clarify what I did with them, although that should be patently clear for a good reader...:)

I did not dwell on minor points like Cosmogenesis, since it would clash with your preconceived ideas. The paper is on this site under Papers. I also did not dwell in less relevant aspects of Time and only told you about the existence of the Cosmological Time and the we observe only time projections. I mentioned the Gedanken Experiment of the Amoeba in an Ascending Bubble in the Bottom of the Sea..:) Someday, I will explain it better if you cannot understand it.

The last but not the least was the changing in paradigm on matter. It was always used without a thorough description, but in the Hypergeometrical Standard Model I replaced all the Feynman diagrams, Puzzling Confined Quarks, Reciprocal Symmetries (Hamiltonian should be invariant to a substitution of r by 1/r for the Strong force to be unifiable with other forces) by a bunch of simple 4D Deformational Angular Momentum Laden "Musical" Notes.

An chord of four notes represents both an electron or a proton depending upon which one I play first...>:) More complex chords (in multiples of four) make up for all the Hyperons - a very musical family...:)

Now looking from outside of the Universe, it is clear that The Orchestra is Flying at the Speed of Light...:) since each element of the Orchestra (any particle) flies in the 3D Shock Wave Hyperspherical Universe.

I know that immediately each and every crackpot will say... Aha... I knew that the Universe had a tune... I always hear it in the back of my mind...:)

I guess I don't care... :) Crackpots will always be crackpots...

I will tell now you about Pion Plus and the Transmutation Note...:)

Cheers,

MP

The Flying Orchestra

The Flying Orchestra

Let's review what the Hypergeometrical Standard Model has done to the Universe.

The Hypergeometrical Universe Topology places the whole 3D Universe flying at the speed of light as a 3D Hyperspherical Shell or Shock Wave Universe. There has always been some silly statements about the Universe having a tune (being in tune with the Universe)... :) or having a frequency or any other half-backed concept along those lines..

By introducing the concept of dilator as coherences between deformations (modulations) of a 4D space metric, I was able to create the chords associated with difference particles. Simple reasoning about which rotation axis in the four-dimensional space was used to replace funky Quarks like the Strange etc... Delta particles are supposed to have strange quarks, I believe., and of course, they are easily represented by the Hypergeometrical Standard Model.

I am able to explain them and everything (Theory of Everything) without any new construct!!!!!

This is a clean model based upon simple concepts of spinning, 4D volumes and 3D projections of those volumes.

By associating with each particle in the Universe a simple chord which gets repeated over and over again until the particle decays, I was able to associate a Musical Instrument to each particle in the Universe.

Since they are traveling at the speed of light along the Radial coordinate, I can claim that:
I've just thrown the Whole Orchestra along Their Beautiful Song at the Speed of Light....:)

Not only that, I also told you what the song is about....:)


Cheers,

MP

PS- Just a comment about Art Imitating Life...:) If Spielberg where to redo his Encounters of First Kind, the tune played by the alien spacecraft could be recast as the sequence of notes associated with each member of the Hyperon Family...:) That would be a great script....:)

Another Art Imitating Life event was Law and Order yesterday... On that Theory of Everything episode, Stephen Hawkings kills another scientist just to keep the failure of his theory of everything from the public. I was amazed..:) Just kidding...:) Stephen Hawkings didn't kill anyone...:)