Sunday, September 23, 2007

3D Masses - Better Explanation

3D Masses Versus 4D Masses

Since nobody complained or demanded a better explanation, this little mistake lived a long time.
It wasn't' until I had to calculate the masses of everything that I realized that the correct paradigm for 3D Masses and 4D Masses is 4D Volume overlap as opposed to 3D Projection...:)

The correct paradigm is explained below:

a) The 3D Shock Wave Universe which is very thin along the radial direction should be thought as a 4D Shock-Wave nevertheless and not as a 3D hypersphere... This was an approximation that I used to make people more comfortable. It just clashes with the way the dilators interact with each other. They interact with each other in this very thin, but still four-dimensional shock-wave.

b) From my prior statement it should become clear that 3DMass is actually the observed (in physical contact - overlap- with the very thin 4D Fabric of Space) dilator 4D volume overlapping with the 4D Shock-Wave Universe or 4D Fabric of Space.

c) Thus the paradigm for the so called 3D Mass should be one of an intersection between the 4D Dilator and the 4D Shock-Wave Universe or 4D Fabric of Space..:)

This means that if you think about the particles as very thin pizza pies, as soon as they rotate a little, the overlap of their rotated state with the original state gets small very fast. For the case of particles this is really fast. 3D Mass (this above mentioned overlap) is extremely dependent upon the angle of spinning.

That said, it everything should be easier to understand.

A dilator shape shifts from a small pie to a large pie and rotates. One can only perceive the pie when it is flat on the table...:) As soon as it rotates, one cannot see a pie...:)

This simple explanation and the fact that the unification of forces made use of zero phase dilaton interference patterns - Quantum Lagrangian Principle- make it easy to understand the pseudo-quantization of time. Interaction only happens when the pie is on the table or when the dilator lies flat on the very thin 4D Fabric of Space or Shock-Wave Universe. This is covered on the Meaning of Material Existence.



Thursday, September 20, 2007

The Man Who Knew Too Much...:)

The Man Who Knew Too Much...:)

I am in the midst of trying to get my paper posted at the Los Alamos ArXives again...:) As you might know by now, I will not give up...:)
I am not that kind of person...:)

Los Alamos ArXives is a very demanding site. It requires among other things, academic affiliation...:) Einstein wouldn't be able to post his Relativity Theory there...:) He was a lowly patent officer without absolutely any clout with the academia of his days...:)

It was an extremely unlikely event that Einstein, of all people, would come up with any new ideas that other people hadn't already thought...:) After all, all the brilliant thoughts are always thought by the people or classes of people we consider brilliant...:) - we are never surprised...:)
It would be a sin for someone to say that I am smarter than Einstein, Newton and Feynman..:) just because I corrected their work...:) That is wrong...:) I was able to correct their work just because they were able and corageous enough to present their ideas..>:)

If you don't have any ideas, you will never be corrected...:)

There is another reason... Different people will come up with different perspectives on a problem. That is why it is always a good idea to tackle a problem in a group effort...Let's say that, we all think about Physics and deposit our ideas in a depository...:) The best ideas will survive...:)

Today I spoke with someone I admire...:) A man of numbers... one could say, A Man Who Knew Too Much...:) - in fact, He Knows a lot...:)

He mentioned that the probability that I would succeed where Einstein and Feynman failed is very, very, very small...:) - He knows probability..>:)

What is the probability that I could outsmart Einstein, Newton, Feynman and everyone else...:) Nill... Zilch..... :) I agree... Zero Probability...:) I am just a little guy...:) I would be happy if I were allowed to make a small contribution to science..

It is not important if I am proven wrong..:) Bring the tar and feathers...:) I can take some humiliation... I am a humble guy...:) The caveat is that you first have to prove me wrong...:) or at least understand my theory...

Sometimes, I make strong statements just to see if I can engage someone in an intelligent discussion... :) I have many readers but they are very shy...:)
Precluding Einstein from publishing his work would had been a shame. A few years delay on the publication of Einstein's work might had resulted in a totally different world. Possibly the story of atomic power would be very different...

As I mentioned in the Importance of Physics, ideas are extremenly important.

That is the reason why I can not understand the barriers posed by Los Alamos to my ideas. They are very simple. Simple formalism. Conceptually they might be straining...:) and most formalists cannot think properly, but even they should be able to perceive the wealth of fresh new ideas contained in my theory.

It is not important that the theory be correct or experimentally verified. Ideas like the way I match all particles (Hyperons, isotopes) as a combination of a few transmutation notes and variations of the fundamental dilator are valuable.

This hasn't been done before. I proposed that a Proton and an Electron are the same dilator (metric deformational coherence) while allowing for different 3D Masses...:)

This is a major hindrance to any thinking on Unification...:) If you can make the Electron and the Proton to be the same, the mystery of mass disappears... or conversely, the mystery of Charge disappears... (if you so prefer)...

The proposal of a Fundamental Dilator also creates the basis for pseudo-time quantization- a quantum mechanics hidden variable..>:) Pseudo-time quantization means that the 3D Universe (a 4D Shock Wave traveling at the speed of light) steps through R in de Broglie steps equal to the Compton wavelength of one atomic mass unit particle..:) At each step, every dilator moves by a little... Since there is no preferred orientation of the 3D axes with respect to the Radial direction, that small step can be in any direction, creating a wavelike propagation...:)

From this little paragraph you can see how the theory brings about Quantum Mechanics. The Hyperon family dilator assignment completly replaces the Standard Model... You might ask... where are those funky particles?....:)

You can create any funky particle and calculate its mass and lifetime with simple math. Trivial stuff. Not all funky dilator coherences are interesting. Their lifetime depends upon how much strain one creates on the Fabric of Space. The higher the strain, the shorter the lifetime.

The theory has two angles and a 3D radius associated with the 3D helicity of complex chords. Since each hyperon and isotope has the two transmutation notes angles and a 3D moment of inertia, one can calculate the strain and map it to the particle lifetime.

I will return to this soon.

Despite of my friend telling me that the probability is just toooooo small that I could be right...thus it might be a waste of time for him to think about my problems and theory...:) (the last conclusion is mine...:) I am almost a hundred percent sure that I am bringing a new perspective... right or wrong... New ideas should be given a chance...

There is just too much at risk not to give it a chance...:)



PS- I am a taxpayer and am paying for the darn hard drive (used by Los Alamos ArXives..:)
If there is a charitable soul among my readers (who also publish at the Los Alamos ArXives), I would appreciate if you would endorse my publication.
I might as well do some begging... The End is Near for my time of begging... Pretty soon, the theory will be published in two new books. One of my own and another a result of a collaboration...:)

There is a God..>:)



Saturday, September 15, 2007

As Time goes by

The Twin Paradox

I am not going to engage in mindless debate about the Twin Paradox. I am just going to tell you point blank... In my new book...

The book is ready and it will contain the correct explanation about Time...:)

The correct explanation about time describes how Gravitation, Electromagnetism (dilaton field and dilator response) and Particle's lifetimes (dilator's lifetime) depend upon velocity (local deformation of the Fabric of Space).

I am sure you sneared when I said I had the correct explanation. There is a correct and an incorrect explanation for time dilation... Just a hint... The Lorentz transformation or constancy of the speed of light is not the correct explanation...:)

Einstein did not have a geometrical interpretation of time dilation... 4D Lorentz transforms were not understood in terms of imaginary angle rotations as I do..:) Just as a transformation... nothing else..

Einstein couldn't even think about Time properly because he had no geometrical interpretation of time dilation... and no geometrical interpretation about those two dependencies (Universal Force (dilaton field) and particle (dilator) lifetimes)... He could not ask the correct question so he could not get the correct answer....

That is a basic tenet in life.... You can only get the correct answer if you can at least ask the correct question...:)

It will be brief as any of my blogs, but it will be revealing...:)

This is good news indeed ...