Sunday, December 08, 2013

The ABC Conjecture, The InterUniversal Geometry and the Hyperon Family

The ABC Conjecture,

 The Hypergeometrical Universe 

and 

The InterUniversal Geometry


In my prior posting about the ABC Conjecture I mentioned that in creating the assignment for the Hyperon Family, I came across the ABC conjecture.  I have to say that as many of the mystic mathematical associations with the Physical World, I wrote it half tongue-in-cheek.  Half because it takes a little more time than I have right now to investigate the extension of the validity of any association.  The other half is that I believe some if not all of those associations will be held in one way or another.

In my theory, particles can be represented by simple integers because they are multiples (in general) of the Fundamental Dilator. This makes my theory easy to map into Pure Mathematics.... :) All the other theories are cacophonies of "Quantum Numbers", thus necessarily multidimensional.  Quantum Numbers are used even while the reasoning for the word "Quantum" is not clear in those theories - no explicit quantizing process taking place anywhere.

Associations:


  • I mentioned that the charged hyperons mapped into Primes which make them related to the Riemann Hypothesis (that the poles of the Zetha should be primes).
  • Any neutral hyperon should be a sum of two primes (two charged hyperons). This is the Goldbach's Conjecture..:)
  • Neutral particles are Goldebach numbers...:)
  • Every integer greater than 5 can be written as the sum of three primes, would indicate that any particle larger than five-dilators could have a three particle decaying path
  • FIVE are the CRAZY DELTAS 
     




  • Any Majorama particle is equal to 2^n.
  • Any three particles dissociation process follows the ABC Conjecture.  This is simply because if they didn't the dissociation path would lead to a higher order many-body process or interaction.  The three numbers or particles should be co-primes, that is, they cannot be decomposed into a common particle otherwise the actual dissociation pathway would be the one for ABC divided by that common denominator.  So the family is to be created by bootstrapping coprimes of the Fundamental Dilator unit...:)

I liked that Shinichi  Mochizuki used the term InterUniversal Geometry..:)

If I am right, if one delves into describing the elasticity of space and the topology and taxonomy of particles, one will find that the ABC Conjecture has to do with volume in a number space. The volume of a number is the product of its primes

For instance 

10=2*5 is two dimensional and has more volume than just 5.  Primes are unidimensional, thus are the axis of this infinite number space.

If you think about numbers as volumes in a number space, then ABC is a law of conservation of volumes.
Along the same lines, the Riemann Hypothesis or the zeros of a Zeta Function are the eigenvectors of a number space, each prime points to a different direction in it.

Similarly, the Goldbach conjecture is about even numbers being simple two dimensional retangles in the number space.

Similarly the Majorama particles being equal to 2^N gives rise to a number resonance in the Dilator Space..:)  1+3=4, 5+3=8 (5+3=8 is more stable than 1+7=8 mostly likely through entropic arguments....although most likely both pathways would be possible)...

This seems to talk about a unit of area in the number space.  So if you think about numbers as vector in a number space, the ABC conjecture can be thought as:
a)  rad(ABC) is the unit of volume ((AxB).C ) under the product ABC 
b) C is the sum of two vectors in the number space, each with a length equal to A and  B (A and B is the same as Volume of A and Volume of B in the number space), although the number itself is a vector in that space.  This means that a number is both a scalar (volume) and a vector or a vector with a length equal to the volume... etc..:)
The ABC Conjecture looks to be like A+B -> C

There is a simple extension of this reasoning that might be clearer.

Cheers,

MP

Friday, February 15, 2013

The Importance of Physics!


The Importance of Physics

Physics, the understanding of Natural Laws is a captivating lifetime pursuit to me but it is also important to the survival of Mankind.  Today's Asteroid,  Meteors is an emphatic exclamation point to my The Importance of Physics headline.

This posting was initially  published on Sunday, March 04, 2007 and didn't refer to this Asteroid specifically.  I was referring to another one that will be even more dangerous. I am republishing it to remind us why the censorship of my ideas is not a good idea.

There are questions about the the exact trajectory of an incoming doomsday asteroid but there is certainty a high degree of self-censorship with respect to information about that event.

Today, I read again about the 450 million tons asteroid that would cross Earth's path in 2026 at a distance closer than the Moon. It was written in the article that even that was not what the scientist were concerned about. There would be an even closer fly-by.

Well. I came to write this blog and came back to pick up the reference and link to the news. Google had already moved it around or eliminated it.

The case in point is that I have been hearing about this incoming asteroid since December and did not see any scientific discussion in the media about the validity of this information.

If a doomsday asteroid is coming, I would like to offer some fresh ideas on how to eliminate the problem. That will not happen if this theory is not properly evaluated. If theorists put their petty vanity ahead of the needs of Mankind.

I believe some classification of theories in a manner similar to the one that exists in Philica should be in place within the Los Alamos Arxives. One thing that should NOT exist is plain censorship.

Los Alamos Arxives is a taxpayer funded pre-print (eprint) repository, that is, it is the place for papers that were not necessarily sent to a journal or received a peer-review yet. Peers would provide a peer review and that is fair.

In the past, there was no censorship or obstacles to publishing. Eventually, the bar was raised and an endorser was required. I passed that obstacle just to receive an "Inappropriate" review. Nothing else than the word "Inappropriate" was said about the theory. There was no need for anything else. The one who "owns" the repository actively controls whatever is published there.

If a theory has evident flaws the author should be told and the paper should NOT be published. If that is not the case, the paper should be published (eprinted) and occupy some few bytes in some server some place. The incremental cost is zero. The resistance to new ideas by established scientific elites has been an obstacle to the progress of science since there were scientists or the Church.

Today, we have the means to publish our ideas despite these obstacles, but that doesn't provide the extremely important peer-review and peer-recognition. By recognition I don't mean recognition of the author of the idea, but recognition of the idea itself.

An idea stands by itself long after the author is gone, but it has to be recognized by the Intelligentsia and to become part of the idea soup that feed our progress...:)

What we cannot accept is to have physics theories censored willy-nilly by simple minded molecular biophysicists (the "owner" of Los Alamos Archives is coincidentally a Molecular Biophysicist of all things)...:)

I believe that Physics is Fun but it is also Serious. The consequences of censorship, the hyping of stupid ideas for sake of book selling, TV show deal...:) can be high and maybe way too high for us to pay.

Cheers,

MP


Sunday, February 03, 2013

The Whole Universe and a Grain of Sand


The Whole Universe and a Grain of Sand

Normally, I wouldn't bother to juxtapose my ideas against the accepted mainstream Science.  This time, I found this show and it states such stupid ideas that I had to do it.

This show is well done, nice pictures, smiling scientists..... as opposed to my crude postings, so I will do the best I can.

The point I would like to make is the problem associated with a 3D spatial Universe and the Grain of Sand comment.  The curvature of the Universe, according to General Relativity, depends upon the mass it contains.

Since in the mainstream Science there is no fourth non-compact spatial dimension as in the Hypergeometrical Universe Theory, when one talks about curvature, one is always conjecturing about a spacetime curvature.

Depending upon the Universe mass content, the spacetime curvature would be concave, convex or flat (positive or negative or zero).

In a simple manner, a convex spacetime wouldn't have a cycle, that is, the Universe would follow a never returning life path.  Since it has a start - a Big Bang - it would just expand eternally. Conversely, a concave spacetime would indicate a boom and crunch 3D periodic Universe, like if the total mass of the Universe would generate enough gravitational pull to decelerate all the Galaxies and collapse them into a Big Crunch.

The difference between one and the other Universe scenarios lies just on one extra Grain of Sand...:)

If I had conjured up a theory which had such level of criticality, I would be strongly suspicious that I made a silly mistake somewhere.

That should be enough to make any reasonable person to realize that something is amiss...

My theory includes a fourth spatial dimension and keep our 3D Universe in a light-speed expanding hyperspherical hypersurface.  Hence, the curvature can be either a spacetime curvature or a spatial curvature of the Hypersurface within the 4D spatial manifold.  This curvature increases as time goes by no matter what is the distribution of mass within the 3D Hypersurface.  The hyperspherical symmetry makes any point of the hypersphere to be equivalent, so there is no locus of the Big Bang to create a Big Crunch some time later.

The light-speeding expanding hyperspherical universe provides the flat curvature as a given.  The curvature is the age of the Universe times SpeedOfLight, that is a very large radius of curvature and thus a very small curvature.  Expansion occurs without the need of Dark Energy.  Prior Eras had a gravitational force that is stronger according to the inverse 4D radius of the Hypersphere, so looking into far away (the past) one has to take that into consideration when calculating mass (this should eliminate the need for Dark Matter altogether.

Using this simple Cosmological Topology there is no Proof of God's Existence from an extra Grain of Sand or Grain of Salt..>:)... No mesmerizing Cosmological Accident or Feat of God's Engineering...:)
There is no need to invoke a Multiverse nor the Circular Reasoning of the Anthropic Principle where the reason we think about this because this Universe allows us to think about this...:)  This creates a natural filter on the Multiverse.  In all the Universes where we don't exist, we don't ask these profound questions about it Laws.

This is, for me, an example of the utter vanity that prevails in the minds of these scientists and the vanity used to sell ideas to the general public. Not unlike the Comment "Subtle is the Lord", "I want to read God's Mind", or Seeing the Hand of God in a particle collision...:)

Human Vanity is used over and over again to sell shoes, cars, particle accelerators, String Theory, and to give some scientists a bully pulpit...:)

My theory is a simple, humble theory  :), but it should be discussed since the alternatives are really, really stupid.  Well, if not stupid, just plain unnecessarily complex, not unlike the original primitive model of a Flat Earth and a Dome full of Twinkling Stars..:) where all the complexity is hidden in a Almighty God...:)

Cheers,

MP

ps- by the way, String Theory has been disregarded as a solution to this "Puzzle" because given enough parameters it can be the solution of anything.


Thursday, January 10, 2013

The Stroboscopic Universe Questions


Henna has left a new comment on your post "The Stroboscopic Universe":

Would it be possible to observe outside our "Frequency" and what would we see there? Different laws of physics perhaps? Chaos?

Henry asked this interesting question!


The answer relates to the Ghostly Neutrinos.  Most of the particles have multiples of the Fundamental Dilator in it.  This means that the mean frequency of the outgoing dilaton field is the Fundamental Dilator Frequency. 

For example, the four fundamental particles (electron, proton, antielectron and antiproton) are just different phases of the same Fundamental Dilator coherence.  The states involved are shown below:
Neutron contains also a transmutation chord.  The transmutation chord corresponds to a half-electron-antineutrino. Within the coherence, the half-antineutrino corresponds to a rotation within the 3D hyperspherical Universe (as opposed to the more normal spinning -tumbling around within the 4D spatial manifold).  That section of the coherence changes the phase relationship between spinning and tunneling between local metric deformational states, and thus changes which phase is in phase with the 3D lightspeed expanding Hyperspherical Universe.
When a neutron decays, it releases an antineutrino, which corresponds to a two-dimensional deformational coherence.

The involved levels for the neutrino are (2/3,-1/3,2/3) and (2/3,2/3,-1/3).  The levels involved in the fundamental dilator are (2/3,2/3,-1/3) and (0,-2/3,-1/3).

These levels corresponds to two different frequencies.  The difference in frequency means that interaction will be vanishingly small due to the averaging of two cosines of different frequencies go to zero.  This also means that interaction will only occurs at very close range.

So in my theory, the result of having particles that creates dilaton fields of different frequencies yield the so called Ghostly Particles or non-interacting particles.

Cheers,

MP