Sunday, March 30, 2008

Kiril Chucanov

Discussions about Free Energy Production

This is an sequence of emails where Kiril Chucanov explained or promoted an invention of his. This invention is supposed to create energy out of zero point fluctuations.

As you might know, I am a strong opposer of current interpretation of Zero Point Fluctuations of Electromagnetic Vacuum.

The reason being that the Universe is not a nice metalic box, thus we don't have neatly spaced normal modes. The other objection is that the energy associated with those electromagnetic normal modes would be infinite.

The last but not least reason why I questioned the existence of an Electromagnetic Vacuum is my own model for the photon or light. In my theory, electromagnetic waves are modulations of the dilator field (the one pervasive waving of the whole universe metric with a wavelength equal to the Compton wavelength of an hydrogen atom or Fundamental Dilator). These modulations occur due to fluctuations in the source of the dilator field position, that is, a coherence between electronic states creates a alternating dipole and that generates the electromagnetic field. Thermal fluctuations also generates fluctuations of the dilators and thus generates a background electromagnetic bath..

Since the dilators (electron and protons) are in flux, driven by a thermal bath, there will be fluctuations but those fluctuations will be associated with matter. The farther from matter you are the lowest the amplitude of those fluctuations.

This puts an upper limit in the amount of energy available for zero point of energy extraction. Of course, if we could extract that energy we would cool down the environment - not unlike Dr. Freeze...:)

Please read the emails from top to bottom. The topmost is the oldest one.

Cheers,

MP
________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________
From: MP

Subject: RE: Alternative explanations for Inflation and Cooper Pairs

Dear Colleagues,

Well, I am extremely pleased to inform that there is fresh criticism to my theory, which I will try to defend in the most cordial terms. I know for sure that without criticism one cannot improve one’s ideas.

I also know that it is not appropriate to engage other people just because I have their email addresses, thus this is just an email to let you know that there is a chance for you to place your comments on an ongoing scientific discussion and it is not the first one of a series of unrequited emails.

I will address Professor Smulsky’s comments on my blog and directly to him. In the blog, I will always keep people’s names out to provide the most freedom of discussion possible.

Of course, I will only place Professor Smulsky’s comments on my blog with his permission. If you don’t want to be part of a public scientific discussion, please let me know and I will reply to any comments in private emails.

By default, unless told otherwise, I will post comments stripped of names, titles etc and their rebuttals onto the blog. The blog is educational and this is to allow most people to appreciate Science and scientific arguments.

You are welcome to email me direct comments or to post them anonymously onto the blog site.

Professor Smulsky, I will only be able to reply to you during the weekend.

I appreciate your comments and welcome a scientific discussion.

Yours sincerely,

MP
Ps- Please include my email on any reply. Somehow I missed Professor Smulsky’s reply the first time and only know about it because it was forwarded to me.

These are the mentioned blogs
My latest two blogs provide an hypergeometrical explanation for Cooper pairs and Superconductivity.
http://hypergeometricaluniverse.blogspot.com/2008/03/hypergeometrical-cooper-pairs.html

and a rebuke to the Inflation Theory
http://hypergeometricaluniverse.blogspot.com/2008/03/not-guth-enough.html
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
From: Dr. Chucanov

Dear MP,

Prof Smulsky is right to say that our universe is observable and measurable in principle, nothing exists out of measurement, and nothing is hidden (like the so-called physical vacuum or virtual particles). However he is not right that Einstein’s view on Nature is right one. Einstein’s theories are dead born theories – they are based on pure mathematics, they luck philosophy.

A. Einstein was the only person among fathers of contemporary quantum mechanics who never understood quantum world. Einstein’s principles of separation and unification of strong, weak, electro-magnet, and gravity forces, are the most destructive ideas ever in the fundamental physics. Very aggressive propaganda created his image as “The greatest physicist of all times”. Einstein’s type of physics is comfortable shell for university educated scientists – they build their career and reputation on this wrong science.

Mathematical skills, not imagination/revelation, are used to create the multiple published by them “theories of everything”. Real Theory of Everything has nothing common with Einstein’s false ideas.

Kiril Chukanov, Inventor of Quantum Free Energy.

kiril@chukanovenergy.com
http://www.chukanovenergy.com/
_______________________________________________
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
From: Kiril Chucanov

On the attached video is my industrial Quantum Free Energy generator ANLAUTRON-IV. It produces tens of times over-unity.

Best regards,

Kiril Chukanov
http://www.chukanovenergy.com/
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
From: MP

Dr. Chucanov,

In a perpetual motion device (a device that produces more energy that it consumes) the first and only relevant information is how are you measuring the energy output and input. Everything else is secondary.

I don't see a calorimeter or anything equivalent in your video.

Could you please send me information about the croux of your claims that your output is ten times the energy input.

Thanks,

MP
________________________________________
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
From:Kiril Chucanov

You don’t see, but this doesn’t mean there is no calorimetric measurements. I’m working for business and I have no intention to give you any details on my work.

Best regards,

Kiril Chukanov
________________________________________
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
From:MP

Kiril,

To mention that you placed the whole microwave into a calorimeter… used up 2000 watts-hour of electricity and raised the temperature of the calorimeter (with a thermal mass of such and such by such and such degrees would be equivalent to any other disclosure you have already made…. e.g. 1000% energy return….Of course, this has to be a steady state measurement to avoid the processing of metastable species…

If you are using a 1000 watts microwave oven and observing a fraction of that amount coming out of your device that would indicate poor experimental design… As you know to make plasma or light out of a gas and microwave is not new…

I created a theory. In my case, the proof that I had a theory was the pdf with a bunch of equations.

If you make a loud claim like the one you are making right now, you should expect to be asked to deliver the same level of information, otherwise you will be considered just noise…

What I asked is not a disclosure of how it works or anything else.. just a simple check of energy balance.

I saw a few of your videos but they fail to provide anything meaningful with respect to your claim.

This is the basis of your claims for a perpetual motion device (A.K.A. energy out of nothing device).

If you were serious about your invention you would keep it quiet, patent it and exploit it commercially. Since you are not doing that, I assume that you are planning to make money out of books or whatever merchandising you might be able to muster.

I hope you prove me wrong. We all would benefit from a free lunch (free energy).

Cheers,

MP
________________________________________ _________________________________________ _________________________________________
From: KIRIL CHUKANOV

Subject: RE: quantum free energy generator works

You are far away from the truth, Sir. Now, in my facility in Calgary, Canada, I have several powerful QFE generators ready for business. It’s not 2 KW, it’s 5 MW. I post my books on my web-site for free use – I don’t want to make money from my books. About energy balance don’t worry – I know my job, I’m PhD in thermodynamics, and my investors have their own specialists. Your theory with bunch of equations is just mathematics having nothing common with Relity in the world.

Good luck.
________________________________________ _________________________________________ _________________________________________
From: MP

Your response still leaves a lot to desire, Dr. Chukanov.

As a PhD in Thermodynamics you should know that I requested a reply in terms of energy balance and not peak power.

In my past career I used to work with terawatt lasers but they were powered by kilowatt power supplies.

If you are telling me that you have a working 5 Megawatt power plant in Calgary, Canada, extracting energy out of thin air with a miser input of just 10% (500 Kw)... I am trully impressed and sold... :) Let me know where is the dotted line, such way that I can invest in your company..:)

If you are just mincing words and telling me that you were able to produce a peaked output power that was 10 times larger than the the average input power, then I would tell you to consider other mechanisms where slow inputs build up into explosive output...humm not unlike blowing a balloon...

You slowly increase the pressure in the ballon until it explodes and release all the stored energy (most of it)...

In any event, if you meant to say that your actually have a 5MW power plant in Calgary, I am sure I will hear from you in all scientific journals, newspapers, etc...:)

If not, I would be sorry for your investors..:)

Best wishes,

MP


PS- As you should know, anyone proposing a perpetual motion device is always in a weak position due to our biases. Everything I know tells me that it should not work and you are illuding (intentionally or not) your investors and public. On the other hand, I like to believe that people are good and that somehow physics is hidding some nice discoveries here and there.. Thus, I would like to wish you and your investors the best of luck..:)
________________________________________ _________________________________________ _________________________________________
From: KIRIL CHUKANOV

I’m sorry for you, stupid man.

________________________________________ _________________________________________ _________________________________________
________________________________________ _________________________________________ _________________________________________
________________________________________ _________________________________________ _________________________________________

Some people doesn't take criticism or even scientific enquiry in a civilized manner.

I wouldn't want to be one of this guy's poor investors..:) (if they are not poor yet, they will become...:)

Cheers,

MP
Post a Comment