Dr. Fate

Dr. Fate

I am not someone given to believe in Fate. Unless it is Scientific Fate or the Fate of my scientific theory...

My last Blog explored the need to believe or better the imperative for believing contained in certain widely accepted theories. As you might know, wide acceptance is not an assurance of correctness..:)

By the way, surrounding oneself just with friendly admirers is what academia has been doing and that is what precluded a stronger revaluation of current models and created the censorship conditions that prevail today. One should welcome ideas and their purporters if they pass basic scrutiny. I did that with Dr. Chucanov. If one idea is not good, it shouldn't take a big effort to pinpoint its flaws.

For example: The Standard Model started with some nicely defined Up and Down Quarks... As usual, they asked us to believe. Someday, in some huge accelerator we would meet those little things and be happy that we knew they would come..:) When they did not appear, they asked us to believe that they were glued together...:) Oh, Good Lord....

Peter Higgs demanded us to believe that a Boson would come out of collisions in the heart of another beast (another accelerator - Large Hadron Collider)... It is just the beast that changed, the request is the same ---- Faith ....

No wonder some people see some similarities between Religion and Science. Both can be dogmatic and censor iconoclastic non members of the choir...

Despite of this requirement of Faith, I believe that Fate is a slightly different concept. They sound pretty much the same to me, but in one we have to drop disbelieve, rationality, questioning (Faith) while in the other we only have Rationality, Questioning to hold us up...

My believe in Fate is that there will be a theory in which things will fit so well and make so much sense that Anyone Will Be Able To See That Truth Has Been Spoken.

Of course, that will have to be followed by hardcore experimental proof...:)

A theory is just a guide...... A great theory can be a map...

Currently, I am placing my bets on my theory. I had other "Theories" in the past, but I knew that they were just concoctions in which things pointed, maybe, in the correct direction but they didn't hold water properly..;)

I've never bother people with hare-brain schemes like Peter Higgs or Alan Guth (Higgs Boson and The Inflation Theory), but I decided that The Hypergeometrical Universe deserved a closer look.

There is a path for redemption for Peter Higgs and Alan Guth or any other Big Wig. It is very simple, just take a position in favor of bringing (my theory and others) back into the realm of discussion... Not unlike reopening the Plenarium for debate.

Unsettle Physics!!!

Of course, that would be slightly detrimental to your Superstar status but in History that would make you even Bigger. It takes a real scientist to second guess himself/herself, to revise one's own hypotheses and to appreciate the beauty in someone else's ideas.

Currently, I believe that the Fate of this theory is to have its own life. I am just the messenger.

Some people mentioned that Science requires a highly mathematical framework. I don't believe that to be the case. Any theory is just simple ideas dressed up in algebra. The ideas behind them are always quite simple...an Harmonic Oscillator here, a vibrating string there, mapping mass to a self-energy or not....making infinite equal to zero.... etc...etc...

All the math, the proposed Lagrangians, Green Function Propagators, Feymann Diagrams sums, Dyson Theorem, etc. are simple ideas... Superstrings wrapped around Calabi-Yau manifolds always reminds me Bacon Wrapped Scallops...:)

Those are simple analogies and they taste great...:)

I used Naked Science in my blog because it shows how rich this theory is and how much easier it is to think in terms of physical ideas than to get lost in algebra.

The goal is to See The Florest By The Trees..:)

If you oppose censorship, click the Chicken below and learn all about my plight...:)

Cheers,

MP

PS- Read this with the musical background...:) By the way, I identify myself with Dr. Fate...:)

Of course, not being a connosseur of marvel comics, I suspect Dr. Fate is a Force of Good..:)

Sapor Similis Pullus

The God Particle

The God Particle

Forgive me saying something against a God Particle, but this is a stretch... Not unlike Inflation Theory ( in fact, these are my two pet peeves)...

I am not saying that the Fundamental Dilator is the only possible solution to the problem of Mass.

I made Mass totally disappear with it...:) I succesfully replaced Mass with displacement 4D volumes within a spinning coherence: The Fundamental Dilator

Above are two electrons with opposing spins...:) and the best explanation for the existence of Cooper pairs and the why of Hund's Law. Opposing spinning electrons show zero attraction or repulsion among each other...:) That is why you can put them neatly into orbitals...:)

I also explained why one Kilogram (inertial) of Electrons have Zero Gravitational Mass...:) Just a result of interaction averaging out to zero.

While Peter Higgs, François Englert and Robert Brout were trying to explain Mass using some God Given Particle or God Himself, I explained Mass Away...

People shouldn't mix Religion references and Science. It would be horrible if one cannot see the God Boson coming out of those Large Hadron Collider Collisions...

By the way, we know that we can make "Bosons" out of collisions (e.g. Delta Zero, Pion Zero).

Is Dr. Higgs telling me that Delta Zero, Pion Zero are The False ProphetParticles?

How would you know that you created a Boson that gives Mass to a particle... Just because it has some weight (Mass)..:) given to itself?? That would be a quite weak proof of the existence of the God Particle...

I would expect something along the lines of the God Boson coming down the pipe and interacting wih another humble particle and bestowing it the Gift of Masslessness...:) such that it would just fly faster than the speed of light out of there...:) That would make me a believer..

Of course, if one could keep such God Particle around one long enough, one could ask for larger favors like making an Apple to fall upwards or downwards at infinite speed...:)

In summary, I don't believe it is possible to attach to an extremely short-lived particle coming out of a collider the title of God Particle. It is my believe that I will have just to believe..:)

I already believe that the Truth is Out There...:)

I certainly know that whatever comes out of those collisions would be less relevant than Coherent Nuclear Fusion. I am partial...what can I say..>:)

Today, I learned that there is a great theory out there which is the most accepted geometric relativistic theory. I am looking forward to read about it... I've never managed to ask if that theory contains the concept of Mass. If a contain that awful concept, it can never be really geometrical..:)

Of course, I might be wrong, but in General Relativity, Mass takes a quite important place...:)

My theory is consistent with General Relativity but it doesn't contain Mass.

By the way, I somehow seek exactly the people who might disagree with me to collegially discuss ideas. There is little value in preaching to the choir...:)

Please, support the site...:) Everytime one clicks the Bird below, a matching grant is issued to help in the search of the God Particle...:)

I want to Believe..

Cheers,

MP

Sapor Similis Pullus

Plunger Physics and the Casimir Effect

Plunger Physics and the Casimir Effect

How and Why would one think about solving the World's Energy Problems with a Photonic Plunger? That boggles my mind...:)

This is another case of Physics going down the toilet..:)

I couldn't resist the pun..:)

Oh no, there I go again...

Since I was forced to think about UFOs, Energy from Vacuum etc... I might as well provide you with another interpretation of the Casimir Effect and its implications. In the prior blog I brought about answered questions about Ball Lightening and Kiril Chucanov quest to solve energy problems with microwave ovens and plasma balls. Now I will tackle another fashionable Ponzi Scheme for Getting Rich Quickly (in energy terms, of course) - Energy from Zero Point Fluctuations and the Casimir Effect...

This effect is the basis for the hope for energy out of nothing. There is nothing wrong with asking something for nothing...:) The problem is that most people don't know how to ask...:)

Don't ask me from where did I get my inspiration for this blog...:)

Let's first analyse what is involved in the Casimir Effect. This is the observation of an attractive force when two metalic plates are placed very close...:)

Where there is a force, there is the possibility of extracting work or energy..>:)

The problem with Casimir effect is that everyone knows how to measure the attractive force and how to use it to justify seeking an infinite source of energy out of electromagnetic vacuum...write those grant proposals, executive summaries...:) I say electromagnetic because one needs metalic plates to observe the phenomenon and of course, the derivation involves electromagnetic modes..

Let's consider another physical experiment - I will not try to make a Gedanken Experiment in this special situation...:)

Let' consider Plunger A on contact with a metalic surface B. Under those conditions there are no forces between A and B. Now let's expel the air between Plunger A and Metalic Surface B....:)

Now, suddenly an attractive force appears out of nowhere...:)

Notice that nobody asks if there is a way to solve the world's energy problems using a plunger...:)

The reason is because everyone knows that it takes work to expel the air from the plunger...If you ever get anything out of it, it will be the work you put in...

That is, you get out what you put in...

The attractive force will never create a useful work...:) It is in the wrong direction to begin with...:) This is even more true in the Casimir Effect experimental setup...

I guess, in the plunger experiment it is difficult to see how one gets the energy back, but I am sure you get it back. As air slowly gets into the space between A and B, it pushes A out and returns the work, adiabatically.

In the Casimir effect everyone talks about the attraction between the plates, but not about the work done to get the plates together. That is a logical flaw in this pursuit of infinite energy out of nothing...:)

Of course, the plunger being pushed towards the metalic plate is due to the collision of the molecules in the air (air pressure). If you remember that photons also carry momentum (have this particle-like character in addition to having a wavelenght) and that the proximity of the plates also displace them (shrinks the phase space available for stationary modes), then the analogy becomes obvious. Photonic pressure is the source of the Casimir Effect..:)

The plates in a Casimir Effect experiment are nothing more than a Photonic Plunger...:)

The simple answer is that in this case, you get what you put in... Nothing else..:)

We (I) know that the Universe is a Free Lunch...:)

You people have to learn how think a little better to be invited for some free food...:)

Cheers,

MP

ps- if there is an interest, I wold be happy to explain the Kohn anomaly and its relationship with superconductivity...:) By now, it should be self-evident what I would say...:)

Let's see a show of hands..:)

Great Balls of Fire...:)

Great Balls of Fire

Holy Cow...:)

I had a nice discussion with Kiril Chucanov in the last few days...:) As usual, from friction comes light...:)

The discussion wasn't a great sucess... I wasn't able to ascertain if Kiril Chucanov was onto something or just blowing smoke...

He places videos of Balls of Fire in microwave ovens..:) and claimed a 5MW Power Plant that creates energy from nothing.

I wanted him to say - "Well, I injected 100 Joules and derived 1000 Joules.. or I ran the power plant for 1 hour and extracted 18000 mega Joules... " This is the heat created in just one hour by a 5MW power plant..in fact, it can be even higher if the 5MW is an output power specification as opposed to just a simple measure of available power..

As you might now, to dissipate 18000 megaJoules is no small feat... I suppose the experimental setup is not linked to the power grid and that energy is extracted as heat only...This situation poses significant difficulty since one cannot dump legally large quantities of scalding water into the sink...

I would expect that a working power generator based upon such discovery would only be created after clear evidence of its validity, valid patents, etc.

Had he said that, I would take his word for it... That would be a meaningful statement... That amount of power would have to come out as heat and it would be trivial to measure the coolant temperature change during energy extraction...:) it would generate about 12 hundred liters or 260 gallons of boiling water per second...

Nobody would have any doubt about Free Energy if he had just said what I wrote above...

Any questions could only be laid on his credibility... not on experimental error.

Now we will never know...:)
________________________________________
________________________________________
________________________________________
________________________________________
I followed up and found this in the New Scientist:

Lightning balls created in the lab -10 January 2007
From New Scientist Print Edition. Hazel Muir

The luminous orbs the size of ping-pong balls persisted for up to 8 seconds, with smoke trails that formed spiral shapes, suggesting the balls were spinning (Images: Gerson PaivaTools Ball lightning could soon lose its status as a mystery, now that a team in Brazil has cooked up a simple recipe for making similar eerie orbs of light in the lab, even getting them to bounce around for several seconds. Watch a movie of the bouncing balls here.

Thousands of people have reported seeing ball lightning, a luminous sphere that sometimes appears during thunderstorms. It is typically the size of a grapefruit and lasts for a few seconds or minutes, sometimes hovering, even bouncing along the
ground. One eyewitness saw a glowing ball burn through the screen door of a house in Oregon, navigate down to the basement and wreck an old mangle, while in another report, a similar orb bounced on a Russian teacher's head more than 20 times before vanishing.

One theory suggests that ball lightning is a highly ionised blob of plasma held together by its own magnetic fields, while an exotic explanation claims the cause is mini black holes created in the big bang.

A more down-to-earth theory, proposed by John Abrahamson and James Dinniss at the University of Canterbury in Christchurch, New Zealand, is that ball lightning forms when lightning strikes soil, turning any silica in the soil into pure silicon vapour. As the vapour cools, the silicon condenses into a floating aerosol bound into a ball by
charges that gather on its surface, and it glows with the heat of silicon recombining with oxygen.

To test this idea, a team led by Antônio Pavão and Gerson Paiva from the Federal University of Pernambuco in Brazil took wafers of silicon just 350 micrometres thick, placed them between two electrodes and zapped them with currents of up to 140 amps. Then over a couple of seconds, they moved the electrodes slightly apart, creating an electrical arc that vaporised the silicon.

The arc spat out glowing fragments of silicon but also, sometimes, luminous orbs the size of ping-pong balls that persisted for up to 8 seconds. "The luminous balls seem to be alive," says Pavão. He says their fuzzy surfaces emitted little jets that seemed to jerk them forward or sideways, as well as smoke trails that formed spiral shapes, suggesting the balls were spinning. From their blue-white or orange-white colour, Pavão's team estimates that they have a temperature of roughly 2000 kelvin. The balls were able to melt plastic, and one even burned a hole in Paiva's jeans.

These are by far the longest-lived glowing balls ever made in the lab. Earlier experiments using microwaves created luminous balls, but they disappeared milliseconds after the microwaves were switched off.

"The lifetimes of our fireballs are about a hundred or more times higher than that btained by microwaves," says Pavão, whose findings will appear in Physical Review etters. Abrahamson is thrilled. "It made my year when I heard about it," he says. The balls, although still small, lasted long enough to come into the mainstream of bserved natural ball lightning."

Pavão's team is currently working out the chemical reactions involved in the balls' formation, and experimenting with other materials that might work too, including pure metals, alloys and sulphur compounds.

It turned out that The Ball Lightning was just a Ball of Plasma...:)

Well, well, well... A very prosaic explanation for something that could revolutionize science...:) Nothing more than ionized hot matter... perhaps ionized Buckminster fullerenes....

There is a silver lining in this Balls of Fire debacle...

Let me propose a GEDANKEN Experiment...:)

Let it be a Bald Eagle (Steven Colbert's Stephen Jr. Bald Eagle) flying in atmospheric conditions where a lightning vaporizes the bird into a carbon rich plasma..>:)

This might look tragic, but for the people on the ground it is just another UFO sighting...;)

By the way, an airplane is naturally polarized, that is, friction should create a difference of potential which could interact with a Ball of Plasma and drag it along...:)

One just has to put two and two to find out that big balls of plasma created under conditions similar to the ones in my GEDANKEN experiment could be what people consider UFO, flying light balls... etc...

You heard here first...:) A Simple Explanation for UFO and the Creation of Balls of Plasma out of Bald Eagles...:)

Cheers,

PS- Paiva...Da proxima vez evite tentar colocar a Ball Ligthning in your pocket...:)

PS- The scientist explained the stability of the plasma ball by magnetic fields. This misses the point that a metal contains free electrons (conduction band). These free electrons are not unlike ionized plasma. From experiments t is clear that a hot (melting) metal is still electrically neutral, that is, the crazy electrons try to go away leaving a hole behind...:) They might try but they are attracted to the hole they left behind and returns. The same is expected to happen in a plasma ball. It should be even more true since the ionized particles have larger masses and lower scape velocities.

Kiril Chucanov

Discussions about Free Energy Production

This is an sequence of emails where Kiril Chucanov explained or promoted an invention of his. This invention is supposed to create energy out of zero point fluctuations.

As you might know, I am a strong opposer of current interpretation of Zero Point Fluctuations of Electromagnetic Vacuum.

The reason being that the Universe is not a nice metalic box, thus we don't have neatly spaced normal modes. The other objection is that the energy associated with those electromagnetic normal modes would be infinite.

The last but not least reason why I questioned the existence of an Electromagnetic Vacuum is my own model for the photon or light. In my theory, electromagnetic waves are modulations of the dilator field (the one pervasive waving of the whole universe metric with a wavelength equal to the Compton wavelength of an hydrogen atom or Fundamental Dilator). These modulations occur due to fluctuations in the source of the dilator field position, that is, a coherence between electronic states creates a alternating dipole and that generates the electromagnetic field. Thermal fluctuations also generates fluctuations of the dilators and thus generates a background electromagnetic bath..

Since the dilators (electron and protons) are in flux, driven by a thermal bath, there will be fluctuations but those fluctuations will be associated with matter. The farther from matter you are the lowest the amplitude of those fluctuations.

This puts an upper limit in the amount of energy available for zero point of energy extraction. Of course, if we could extract that energy we would cool down the environment - not unlike Dr. Freeze...:)

Please read the emails from top to bottom. The topmost is the oldest one.

Cheers,

MP
________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________
From: MP

Subject: RE: Alternative explanations for Inflation and Cooper Pairs

Dear Colleagues,

Well, I am extremely pleased to inform that there is fresh criticism to my theory, which I will try to defend in the most cordial terms. I know for sure that without criticism one cannot improve one’s ideas.

I also know that it is not appropriate to engage other people just because I have their email addresses, thus this is just an email to let you know that there is a chance for you to place your comments on an ongoing scientific discussion and it is not the first one of a series of unrequited emails.

I will address Professor Smulsky’s comments on my blog and directly to him. In the blog, I will always keep people’s names out to provide the most freedom of discussion possible.

Of course, I will only place Professor Smulsky’s comments on my blog with his permission. If you don’t want to be part of a public scientific discussion, please let me know and I will reply to any comments in private emails.

By default, unless told otherwise, I will post comments stripped of names, titles etc and their rebuttals onto the blog. The blog is educational and this is to allow most people to appreciate Science and scientific arguments.

You are welcome to email me direct comments or to post them anonymously onto the blog site.

Professor Smulsky, I will only be able to reply to you during the weekend.

I appreciate your comments and welcome a scientific discussion.

Yours sincerely,

MP
Ps- Please include my email on any reply. Somehow I missed Professor Smulsky’s reply the first time and only know about it because it was forwarded to me.

These are the mentioned blogs
My latest two blogs provide an hypergeometrical explanation for Cooper pairs and Superconductivity.
http://hypergeometricaluniverse.blogspot.com/2008/03/hypergeometrical-cooper-pairs.html

and a rebuke to the Inflation Theory
http://hypergeometricaluniverse.blogspot.com/2008/03/not-guth-enough.html
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
From: Dr. Chucanov

Dear MP,

Prof Smulsky is right to say that our universe is observable and measurable in principle, nothing exists out of measurement, and nothing is hidden (like the so-called physical vacuum or virtual particles). However he is not right that Einstein’s view on Nature is right one. Einstein’s theories are dead born theories – they are based on pure mathematics, they luck philosophy.

A. Einstein was the only person among fathers of contemporary quantum mechanics who never understood quantum world. Einstein’s principles of separation and unification of strong, weak, electro-magnet, and gravity forces, are the most destructive ideas ever in the fundamental physics. Very aggressive propaganda created his image as “The greatest physicist of all times”. Einstein’s type of physics is comfortable shell for university educated scientists – they build their career and reputation on this wrong science.

Mathematical skills, not imagination/revelation, are used to create the multiple published by them “theories of everything”. Real Theory of Everything has nothing common with Einstein’s false ideas.

Kiril Chukanov, Inventor of Quantum Free Energy.

kiril@chukanovenergy.com
http://www.chukanovenergy.com/
_______________________________________________
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
From: Kiril Chucanov

On the attached video is my industrial Quantum Free Energy generator ANLAUTRON-IV. It produces tens of times over-unity.

Best regards,

Kiril Chukanov
http://www.chukanovenergy.com/
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
From: MP

Dr. Chucanov,

In a perpetual motion device (a device that produces more energy that it consumes) the first and only relevant information is how are you measuring the energy output and input. Everything else is secondary.

I don't see a calorimeter or anything equivalent in your video.

Could you please send me information about the croux of your claims that your output is ten times the energy input.

Thanks,

MP
________________________________________
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
From:Kiril Chucanov

You don’t see, but this doesn’t mean there is no calorimetric measurements. I’m working for business and I have no intention to give you any details on my work.

Best regards,

Kiril Chukanov
________________________________________
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
From:MP

Kiril,

To mention that you placed the whole microwave into a calorimeter… used up 2000 watts-hour of electricity and raised the temperature of the calorimeter (with a thermal mass of such and such by such and such degrees would be equivalent to any other disclosure you have already made…. e.g. 1000% energy return….Of course, this has to be a steady state measurement to avoid the processing of metastable species…

If you are using a 1000 watts microwave oven and observing a fraction of that amount coming out of your device that would indicate poor experimental design… As you know to make plasma or light out of a gas and microwave is not new…

I created a theory. In my case, the proof that I had a theory was the pdf with a bunch of equations.

If you make a loud claim like the one you are making right now, you should expect to be asked to deliver the same level of information, otherwise you will be considered just noise…

What I asked is not a disclosure of how it works or anything else.. just a simple check of energy balance.

I saw a few of your videos but they fail to provide anything meaningful with respect to your claim.

This is the basis of your claims for a perpetual motion device (A.K.A. energy out of nothing device).

If you were serious about your invention you would keep it quiet, patent it and exploit it commercially. Since you are not doing that, I assume that you are planning to make money out of books or whatever merchandising you might be able to muster.

I hope you prove me wrong. We all would benefit from a free lunch (free energy).

Cheers,

MP
________________________________________ _________________________________________ _________________________________________
From: KIRIL CHUKANOV

Subject: RE: quantum free energy generator works

You are far away from the truth, Sir. Now, in my facility in Calgary, Canada, I have several powerful QFE generators ready for business. It’s not 2 KW, it’s 5 MW. I post my books on my web-site for free use – I don’t want to make money from my books. About energy balance don’t worry – I know my job, I’m PhD in thermodynamics, and my investors have their own specialists. Your theory with bunch of equations is just mathematics having nothing common with Relity in the world.

Good luck.
________________________________________ _________________________________________ _________________________________________
From: MP

Your response still leaves a lot to desire, Dr. Chukanov.

As a PhD in Thermodynamics you should know that I requested a reply in terms of energy balance and not peak power.

In my past career I used to work with terawatt lasers but they were powered by kilowatt power supplies.

If you are telling me that you have a working 5 Megawatt power plant in Calgary, Canada, extracting energy out of thin air with a miser input of just 10% (500 Kw)... I am trully impressed and sold... :) Let me know where is the dotted line, such way that I can invest in your company..:)

If you are just mincing words and telling me that you were able to produce a peaked output power that was 10 times larger than the the average input power, then I would tell you to consider other mechanisms where slow inputs build up into explosive output...humm not unlike blowing a balloon...

You slowly increase the pressure in the ballon until it explodes and release all the stored energy (most of it)...

In any event, if you meant to say that your actually have a 5MW power plant in Calgary, I am sure I will hear from you in all scientific journals, newspapers, etc...:)

If not, I would be sorry for your investors..:)

Best wishes,

MP


PS- As you should know, anyone proposing a perpetual motion device is always in a weak position due to our biases. Everything I know tells me that it should not work and you are illuding (intentionally or not) your investors and public. On the other hand, I like to believe that people are good and that somehow physics is hidding some nice discoveries here and there.. Thus, I would like to wish you and your investors the best of luck..:)
________________________________________ _________________________________________ _________________________________________
From: KIRIL CHUKANOV

I’m sorry for you, stupid man.

________________________________________ _________________________________________ _________________________________________
________________________________________ _________________________________________ _________________________________________
________________________________________ _________________________________________ _________________________________________

Some people doesn't take criticism or even scientific enquiry in a civilized manner.

I wouldn't want to be one of this guy's poor investors..:) (if they are not poor yet, they will become...:)

Cheers,

MP